Regulation reform moves through House committees

  • Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 12:28 a.m.

RALEIGH (AP) — Large bills on regulatory reform and environmental laws cleared several House committees Wednesday but did not make it to the House floor.

The regulatory reform measure contains dozens of other wide-ranging provisions, including ethics requirements for city officials and the privatization of mug shots. It also would regulate zoning for fraternity and sorority houses at colleges and universities. A measure requiring licenses for landscape contractors was removed.


Lawmakers said the licensing provision protected the landscape industry instead of the public and could provide a barrier for smaller startup landscape companies. Another provision would prohibit billboard owners from removing vegetation along highway ramps to make signs visible.

The regulatory reform bill includes provisions that have previously surfaced in other forms, including a measure that bans children and teenagers younger than 18 from using a tanning bed.

All mug shots would be kept from the public until someone is charged with a crime under another provision that is a spinoff from a House bill filed last month. The provision could prevent news organizations and websites from publishing mug shot galleries and commercial companies from charging people a fee to take the picture down.

A Senate bill the House also considered includes a provision that would increase the size of wetlands subject to state protection. Environmentalists say that move could make smaller wetlands vulnerable.

An amendment to lower the size requirement and expand protections was shot down in the House Environment committee.

“These isolated wetlands are really a part of our regional water systems,” said Rep. Verla Insko, D-Orange. “They provide an important purification function. We need to be very careful about deregulating them in general.”

The full House may take up both bills later this week.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.