• 70°

Confederate group contests public safety exception after protests, riots involving monuments

SALISBURY — In a letter sent to North Carolina municipalities last week, the North Carolina Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans said “violent protests and the like” are “doubtful rationale” for removing Confederate monuments under a public safety exception to a 2015 state law. 

The letter, which the N.C. Sons of Confederate Veterans provided to media outlets, specifically references Chapter 100 of North Carolina General Statues, which was changed in 2015 with the passage of a law called the Historic Artifact Management and Patriotism Act (S.L. 2015-170). The bill passed with no opposition in the Senate and by a 70-39 count in the state House. All of Rowan County’s members of the House and Senate voted for the bill. 

The law specifically prohibits the permanent removal of “objects of remembrance” on public property and only allows the temporary or permanent relocation of monuments in specific instances, including when necessary to preserve an object. The law further says that monuments relocated must be moved to sites of similar “prominence, honor, visibility, availability and access” within the boundaries of the same jurisdiction where it was originally placed. Museums, cemeteries and mausoleums are not an acceptable place for relocation, unless the monument was originally placed in one, the law states.

There are, however, exceptions to the law, including when an “object of remembrance” is owned by a private party, located on public property and the subject of a legal agreement between the owner and the state or a political subdivision of the state such as a city or town. That exception is relevant in the case of Salisbury, which has gotten approval from the owner of “Fame,” the Robert F. Hoke Chapter of the United Daughters of Confederacy, OK for a relocation agreement. 

The Salisbury City Council had previously intended to move forward with relocation under a public safety exception, with its approved resolution doing so mentioning an incident where gunshots were fired in the air during a peaceful protest in addition to vandalism other incidents involving the “Fame” in recent history. But the Sons of Confederate Veterans said in its letter that “exterior threats by violent protesters, rioters or vandals” do not count as a public safety exception.

“We sincerely stress that actions taken in derogation of the law because of violent mobs, rioters, protestors or vandals cannot be supported,” the NC Sons of Confederate Veterans said in its letter. “In this case, the law clearly supports the monuments remaining in place. Please understand we wish to work with localities within the state, but we do ask that they abide by the controlling principle in our republic, that if laws passed by a state legislature are ignored, then the mob controls thereby making ineffectual the rule of law.”

Salisbury, though, no longer needs use the public safety exception after the UDC signed the agreement relocating “Fame.” The agreement involves the city of Salisbury paying for the relocation and the Historic Salisbury Foundation overseeing funds raised by private individuals to make improvements to the North Lee Street cemetery.

“As a woman of faith, my heart is full of gratitude to God Almighty, that our city leadership and citizens have chosen a path of mutual respect and respect for the laws of our state and nation to find a peaceful and lawful resolution to this long debated issue,” Mayor Karen Alexander said in a statement announcing the deal had been finalized.

Exactly when “Fame” will be relocated is not clear. On Friday, city staff covered the base of the monument with clear and black plastic to prevent vandalism.

The Sons of Confederate Veterans does not specifically mention Salisbury’s Confederate monument, but it does speak about a decision by Gov. Roy Cooper to remove Confederate monuments after pieces of one near the Capitol were torn down and pulled through the streets. One piece of the monument was hung from a light pole.

A building inspector’s ruling about a monument’s structural condition must be the judge of whether a public safety exception is relevant, the Sons of Confederate Veterans says.

But Cooper in a statement announcing the monument removal said he was “concerned about the dangerous efforts to pull down and carry off large, heavy statues and the strong potential for violent clashes at the site.”

“If the legislature had repealed their 2015 law that puts up legal roadblocks to removal we could have avoided the dangerous incidents of last night,” Cooper said in a social media post. “Monuments to white supremacy don’t belong in places of allegiance, and it’s past time that these painful memorials be moved in a legal, safe way.”



‘Never in my wildest dreams’: Moore ready to take the helm of Salisbury High

News Main

Raising the Barr for Rowan golf


Greenway expansion, traffic signal maintenance submitted for federal funding


Salisbury VA says telehealth usage up 971%




Editorial: Take precautions during Fourth of July gatherings


Harrison Peel: Tillis owes voters real answers


Many offices closing Friday to observe July 4th


Sheriff offers July 4th safety tips


Sports legends: Josh Reeves took coaching skills he picked up in Kannapolis to high school in Alabama


Mitch Kokai: Put NC at front of line for recovery


Faith resident won’t let COVID-19 infect patriotic spirit


Landis hires CPA firm to conduct 2019-20 audit during special called meeting


Letter: Brownlee raises questions about statue proceedings


Area Sports Briefs: Lyerly qualifies for match play


41 recoveries reported as COVID-19 cases continue to rise by double digits


Registered sex offender found living close to school


Florida woman charged with identity theft, suspected of other crimes


School board narrowly approves allowing students in for driver’s ed, other assessments


New Sarum donates $9,050 to COVID-19 Relief Fund


Longtime educator, Rowan Democrats vice chair plans school board run


Steve Roberts: Trump risks best re-election argument with immigration agenda


Two appointed to Historic Salisbury Foundation board of trustees during virtual annual meeting


Editorial: Disliked option may be best for students returning in fall