• 70°

What is prayer’s role?

New York Post headline

Is it wrong to call for prayer in times of national crisis?

Is it wrong to call for prayer in times of national crisis?

By Michael Brendan Dougherty

Los Angeles Times

Just a few weeks after promoting the #PrayForParis hashtag campaign, the New York Daily News decided that prayer is a perverse response to the San Bernardino massacre. The tabloid’s cover Thursday shouted “God Isn’t Fixing This!” next to tweets from Republican presidential candidates, each one with the word “prayers” highlighted to embarrass them. The implication was that the politicians were hiding behind their prayers when they could be solving the “gun scourge.”

The New York tabloid wasn’t alone. The Huffington Post ran an article that extended the accusatory finger beyond politicians to the broader public on social media. There was a simple takeaway: Screw your prayers, do something!

Of course it’s annoying to see rote statements from politicians about their prayers. They feel scripted and repetitive now that America suffers through high-profile mass shootings on a regular basis. Besides, tweeting about prayers is a good indication that you’re not actually praying.

On the other hand, the public now demands statements from politicians about enormities even as they are unfolding. What else can they say?

The suddenly popular accusation that prayer is an ugly, insincere and insufficient response to tragedy misconstrues why people pray. Mary Elizabeth Williams, in a scorching essay for Salon on these empty gestures, wrote that “it’s actually offensive for public figures who could take action to curtail gun violence to foist the burden of healing the broken lives that violence leaves behind on God.”

But the truth is that people pray for things that our laws and government cannot provide: eternal rest for the victims, consolation for the bereaved, resolve and strength for first responders. They pray seeking understanding of God’s will in a world marred by sin and death. Prayer doesn’t exhaust all of our duties in a human tragedy, and nobody claims that it does. …

An anti-prayer critic might respond: Politicians should instead publicly promise to work for policies that that would prevent future violence. And some did just that.

Perceiving the events at San Bernardino first as an issue of firearms control, not terrorism, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders sent out messages about taking action to stop gun violence. Martin O’Malley named an enemy: the National Rifle Association.

Yet, like prayer, rote tweets urging us toward policy responses, whether they are aimed at controlling guns or discovering terror plots before they happen, demand a kind of blind faith and hope.

If the American public suddenly acceded to restrictive gun control laws, mass shootings like the one in San Bernardino would likely happen from time to time anyway. Even those who support some new measures, myself included, must concede that the kinds of policies that would do the most to reduce firearm fatalities may have little or no effect on terrorist plots or determined mass shooters.

In the first hours after the shooting, I felt far more comfortable presuming that God is merciful and answers prayers than that my own views on gun control, or anyone else’s, would turn out to be directly relevant.

I can open the Scriptures to find an account of God’s mercy in the face of man’s capacity for wickedness. I cannot, however, explain the dramatic decline of violent crime and gun homicide in America over the last two decades. Not when the country is constantly loosening its gun laws.

Without evidence, why should I assume that closing private-sales loopholes, imposing magazine limits or instituting more invasive background checks would have prevented the violence in San Bernardino? If only the Daily News’ skepticism about the sincerity and efficacy of prayer extended just a little further.

The prayer-skeptics will work out their policy responses in fear and trembling as we learn more about the latest atrocity. I wish them luck. As a citizen, I’ll dutifully consider them. As a pundit I’ll offer criticism, hopefully constructive. Until then my thoughts return again and again to the victims. And without intending, I start to pray.

Dougherty writes for the Week.



Blotter: Sept. 19


Kannapolis brewery linked to eight COVID-19 positives


Local Democrats call to ‘turn the state blue’ during virtual office reopening


Funding flat, enrollment down slightly for Rowan-Salisbury Schools


Catawba gets high marks in U.S. News and World rankings for fifth year


China Grove soap store sets sights on expansion into Kannapolis


Charlotte, UNC game canceled after 49ers place players in quarantine


Blotter: Sept. 18


County sees ninth COVID-19 death this week, more than 30 cases reported


Gov. Cooper announces schools can move K-5 to plan A; school board vote needed locally


Wet weather brings crashes, traffic to standstill on interstate


Salisbury man victim of Facebook scam, duped out of $2,000


Two charged after fight outside Salisbury home


Rowan-Salisbury Schools ships out thousands of old devices for refurbishing


Caught in the infodemic: NC school policies frustrated by scientific challenges

East Spencer

East Spencer to hold community day, provide free food, supplies




Landis officials provide plan for COVID-19 funds, discuss town’s financial position


Blattner brought technology into schools before it was cool


State has slight decline in SAT scores


New environmental specialists begin work on backlog soil evaluations


Friends, colleagues say Seay left his mark on Rowan judicial system


Rep. Howard says ‘still work to be done’ as she seeks 17th term in House


Trump disputes health officials, sees mass vaccinations soon