• 91°

Chris Fitzsimon: Why Marriage Amendment should fail

By Chris Fitzsimon
N.C. Policy Watch
The folks determined to write discrimination into the state Constitution are pulling out all the stops to mislead voters about the amendment on the ballot in the May 8 primary.
The pro-discrimination forces don’t want voters to consider the damage the amendment could do to children, families, and workers, gay and straight, across North Carolina.
They want people to believe it’s all about banning same-sex marriage — which is already against the law. But it’s about far more than that.
This week a handful of politically connected district attorneys and former judges appeared at a news conference to basically call amendment opponents liars who are raising concerns about the impact of the amendment on domestic violence laws.
One of the speakers was former judge, tea partier and current Republican candidate for governor Paul Wright. Wright, it turns out, not only supports the marriage discrimination amendment, he favors a personhood amendment to the Constitution which would define a fertilized egg as a person and claims there’s a United Nations conspiracy about local land use planning.
House Majority Leader Paul Stam, a driving force for the amendment in the General Assembly, also has brushed off concerns about the amendment’s impact on domestic violence laws.
Stam simply refuses to consider the opinion of many respected legal scholars who believe otherwise, including Suzanne Reynolds at the Wake Forest University School of Law. Reynolds, as the Associated Press recently pointed out, has written a treatise on family law that is widely cited by lawyers and judges across the state.
Stam’s closed mindedness is nothing new. He and his fellow Republican legislative leaders refused to allow legal experts to testify when the amendment was making its way through the General Assembly last year.
If they are honest, supporters of the amendment have to admit there’s at least uncertainty about what the amendment will mean for domestic violence statutes and a host of other laws. The Constitution is no place for ambiguous, unclear language about basic human rights and legal protections.
Stam has yet to offer any explanation for not allowing the professors to have their say before the amendment was put on the ballot, but the fact that it is overly broad is not an accident.
For Stam and his fellow discriminators, the broader the better. There’s no dispute that the amendment bans civil unions forever. No General Assembly can undo that. Virtually every poll shows the majority of North Carolina voters support either same-sex marriage or civil unions for gay couples.
That means folks like the head of the Pope Civitas Institute are not telling the truth when they claim the majority of people support the amendment.
The majority of people don’t yet realize what the amendment would do. But Stam does, and he’s happy about it.
It’s not about marriage, despite all the claims otherwise. Not really. It is about a ferociously oppressive anti-gay, anti-human rights agenda.
Stam, remember, fought as hard as he could a few years ago to keep sexual orientation off the list of characteristics of students who may be vulnerable to bullying.
He has compared being gay to bestiality and polygamy. He and his Republican colleagues have stood shoulder to shoulder at rallies with speakers who have said being gay is an abomination and that gay people are going to hell.
Republican, pro-discrimination lawmakers have offensively suggested that being gay is a choice that people make.
The Republican Party platform opposes allowing gay parents the right to adopt children or even provide foster care to troubled kids.
That’s the real agenda here, to deny gay North Carolinians basic rights and protections far beyond marriage. It’s not a marriage amendment, not at its core.
It’s a hate amendment. Remember that when you close the curtain on your voting booth.

Comments

Comments closed.

Business

Ahold Delhaize hopes to add 100 new employees at Salisbury distribution center

Local

Cooler weather on the horizon for Rowan after heat wave

Crime

Blotter: July 29

Local

Downtown residents, business owners say noisy construction is A-OK, sign of progress to come

Business

County unemployment rises in June, positive job growth seen in leisure and hospitality sector

Local

NC poet laureate will speak during historical marker celebration, talks about life, race

Local

Spencer moves back public hearing on longer, staggered terms

Education

High school fire academy lets seniors jump start a service career

News

Country Club of Salisbury unveils renovated clubhouse, plots additional upgrades

David Freeze

David Freeze: Biggest adventure day coming next

Local

South Ellis Street in for improvements because of $100,000 grant for BlockWork

Local

Little League softball: Rowan drops regional final, but moves on

Education

Catawba students, grads make it out to the ballpark for summer of baseball

Education

Education briefs: RSS Teacher of the Year gets Phillip J. Kirk Scholarship

News

North Carolina requiring state health workers to get vaccine

Nation/World

Infrastructure deal: Senate suddenly acts to take up bill

News

State briefs: North Carolina woman charged after 4-year-old shoots himself

Coronavirus

Rowan County among communities where CDC recommends masks indoors

Crime

Blotter: Shooters mistakenly fire bullets into woman’s West Kerr Street house

Local

Light installation could delay Bell Tower Green opening, but formal event still set for Sept. 10

Kannapolis

Kannapolis restroom listed among top 10 in the country, vying for top spot

Business

Mixed-use development planned near Atrium Health Ballpark

Local

Little League softball: Rowan plays for regional championship, qualifies for World Series

Nation/World

CDC changes course on indoor masks in some parts of the US