Citistates report: Will Charlotte region lead – or stumble?
By Neal Peirce and Curtis Johnson
Massive economic, climate and cultural challenges face America’s great “citistate” regions in this century. Will the 14-county Charlotte region be one of the handful of citistates that lead the way? Or will the region hesitate and let its glory days fade?
Just check the landscape.
Charlotte banks seem nationally dominant, but they’re operating in dangerous waters of acquisition fever and international economics.
Real estate has boomed across the region. But the sprawling development pattern could be a ticket for failure in resource-restrained times, with prospects of water shortages and gasoline at $5 to $10 a gallon or more.
A radically increased share of the region’s growth needs to go “in” toward city and town centers, and less of it spread “out” across undeveloped lands.
Compactness isn’t necessary only for economy and efficiency. With higher per-capita carbon emission rates than three-fourths of other U.S. regions, Charlotte faces a critical environmental challenge in a century and a world imperiled by global warming.
The region also confronts a deep human challenge: how it welcomes and integrates newcomers. Charlotte is proving itself a 21st-century magnet for aspiring young professionals, for high-end bond traders with European experience and Mexicans with sixth-grade educations who are building the city’s new skyscrapers. It is now one of the United States’ top immigrant “gateway” cities. But there’s a heavy measure of anti-immigrant sentiment in the region. Will diversity remain a strength, helping the region become more entrepreneurial and resilient?
The vision for success must be of a Charlotte region that strives ó and wins ó in this century’s great contest to be “Green, Great and Global.”
– Green: Lead, don’t lag, on answers to global warming. Create broad swaths of carbon-saving, smart new energy systems. Develop market-leading, compact forms of community development. Relearn such values as local and more self-sufficient agriculture (in the process generating more of the other green ó dollars).
– Great: Take the critical risks, be a national leader in developing vital city centers. Build regional cohesion. Expand regional civic collaboration and new leadership.
– Global: Welcome the world to your doorstep. Distinguish yourself as a great place to live, visit and do business, based on economic strength, social vitality and world-standard quality of place.
13 years’ difference
In 1995, we peripatetic writers were first asked to take a look at Charlotte-Mecklenburg and its neighboring Carolinas counties.
We could see plenty of movement and change. High-rise uptown office towers signaled an aspiring banking center. Subdivisions were multiplying across the landscape. Textile mills were declining. But returning in 2008 for a follow-up report, we were stunned.
Textiles, tobacco, furniture had all taken a deep dive. Yet this cluster of neighboring Southern communities was advertising itself proudly, from Europe to Asia, as “Charlotte USA.”
Wachovia had expanded far beyond its old territory. Its rival, NationsBank, had swallowed California-based BankAmerica and kept its headquarters in Charlotte.
Sure, in 2008, reflecting national and international economic uncertainty, some worries have surfaced. Wachovia recently shed assets and a CEO. Bank of America, despite obvious indigestion from swallowing wayward Countryside Financial, last week agreed to buy the giant brokerage Merrill Lynch. But let there be no doubt about the strengths: Those institutions exude confidence in an economically diverse region with nine Fortune 500 companies and at last count 480 foreign companies doing business in Mecklenburg County alone.
Center City revives
Revival in the center city helps!
In 1995 evenings uptown were lonely ó so lonely one restaurant manager advised us not to walk back to our hotel, hinting the streets were dangerous. Now the streets are packed, even Monday and Tuesday nights. People live as well as work uptown. Despite the national chill in commercial real estate, we could see Charlotte’s construction cranes writing a new script of economic growth along the skyline.
Defects in the 2008 Charlotte orbit? Sure. Far too many blank spots ó used for acre upon acre of surface parking ó remain in uptown’s fabric. The hope ó and clear possibility ó is that they’ll fill in, following the pattern in the First Ward and Third Ward neighborhoods.
Across the region we found palpable fear that the recent years’ surge of traffic and physical growth ó fast-spreading distances between business centers, home and work ó might soon duplicate Atlanta’s horrific traffic snarls and degraded quality of life.
But we discovered a drastically improved Charlotte bus system ó true middle-class transit, not just subpar equipment fobbed off on poor folk.
We were amazed to discover this historically car-happy, anti-transit region had just opened its first light rail line. Locally, the debate has shifted almost magically, from “Why spend so much for rail?” to a sharpened chorus of claims by neighborhoods eager for the next line to run in their direction.
The pro-transit case hasn’t yet persuaded many officials in outlying counties, but even there, public sentiment is clearly starting to shift.
We like to think we helped to set the stage with our 1995 report. We had been inspired by the central role given to transit in the analyses of local architect Michael Gallis. We endorsed his idea of a region of “centers and corridors” ó Charlotte at the center but connected to a ring of county seats with development focused along the corridors. A modern transit system, we argued, would be a magnet for efficient growth patterns that let people live, find offices and shops, socialize, get to a transit stop ó all by walking or short drives. Welcoming truly urban densities, we said, would be the only way for Charlotte to avoid Atlanta’s fate.
In 1995, it was a far-out theory. But now the quality/compactness idea has become a compellingly logical 21st-century formula. The region’s old formula ó spread-out houses on rural “greenfields,” leading to longer and longer commutes with intensified traffic, may well prove to be an anachronism, simply unsustainable.
The alternative is more compact, walkable, town- and transit-friendly development. From Birkdale Village in north Mecklenburg to Baxter Village in York County, S.C., some new communities and town centers are defying the old sprawl model.
Sure, lots of people still gravitate to standard new subdivisions. But check the most complete, home-school-shop neighborhoods ó exemplified by Charlotte’s Myers Park and Dilworth, most of Davidson and some of Salisbury’s neighborhoods. Their prices prove they’re among the region’s preferred places to live.
Other changes struck us quickly. In 1995, no one ó really no one ó mentioned water as a worry. Today people are aware it’s a fragile and indispensable resource.
Today, groups and initiatives such as the Catawba Riverkeepers, the Catawba Lands Conservancy and the Carolina Thread Trail emphasize the importance of water quality, land conservation and regional cohesion. The Thread Trail will wind through the entire region, conserving farms and other undeveloped areas.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg has enacted a nationally noteworthy set of new ordinances ó from storm water management to street design guidelines aimed at helping pedestrians and bicycles as much as cars.
Replacing the mills
What can replace lost textile mills?
The last big one, generating a historic record for layoffs in a single day, went down when Pillowtex closed its Kannapolis operations. But 2008 finds Kannapolis staring at possible success again. The audacious idea, brainchild of David Murdock, the mill’s last owner, is to create a nation-leading North Carolina Research Campus for health and nutrition.
In 13 years, a good chunk of the fierce competition among this region’s cities and counties has melted away. There’s some evidence of heightened concern about outlying areas.
We found local governments today plan, talk and work together through the Centralina and Catawba Councils of Government.
Creative change, notes historian Tom Hanchett, has always been this region’s signature talent. It showed it in its determination to be a pioneering trading and then great mill city of the “New South.” Then came its early drive for hydroelectric power, sparked by Duke Power’s engineer-entrepreneurs. It jumped ahead of competitor cities with advanced railroad and highway connections. And it grew into a preeminent banking wonder in the last generation.
Today the region has made an apparently graceful switch from leadership by a narrow core of successful native-born corporate executives. Now there’s a much broader leadership constellation of corporations operating regionally and worldwide. The problem isn’t corporate domination; often it’s just capturing CEO attention for local challenges.
Ultimately, though, the future of the region won’t just be decided by corporate decisions. It will depend most strongly on the civic muscle ó and regional cohesion ó that the people of this potentially great citistate can forge, showing themselves ó and a nation ó how it is possible to prosper while growing green.