• 46°

Borrow when it saves $$

RALEIGH — Fiscal conservatives tend to look askance at large issuances of public debt. In this sentiment, they are in good company. “I go on the principle that a public debt is a public curse,” wrote James Madison, “and in a Republican Government a greater curse than any other.”
His mentor Thomas Jefferson agreed. “We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt,” he said. George Washington warned against “throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear.” And Benjamin Franklin observed that “when you run in debt, you give to another power over your liberty.”

Of course, not a single one of these American Founders avoided debt entirely. Some were personally indebted for much of their lives, much to their frustration. More to the point, all of them accepted the wisdom of public borrowing in certain circumstances.
To advise against a large accumulation of public debt, in other words, is not to exclude borrowing from the fiscal conservative’s toolkit. Rather, it is to use debt only for large-scale projects with high costs in the short run and high returns in the long run. Which brings me to Gov. Pat McCrory’s recent recommendation that the state issue $1 billion in bonds to finance a package of transportation improvements across the state.
North Carolina has traditionally been a low-debt state. Over the decades, state and local policymakers devoted substantial sums to capital needs on a pay-as-you-go basis while using bonded debt as a supplement. Around the turn of the 21st century, that began to change. Faced with continued population growth and less-than-robust revenue growth, governments made greater use of debt, especially in the form of certificates of participation, special-obligation bonds, and other devices that didn’t require a public referendum.

In 1998, the total cost of servicing North Carolina’s state debt was $166 million, or about $22 per resident. By 2013, debt service had risen to $843 million, or $91 per resident. Counties and municipalities loaded up on more debt at the same time. North Carolina has other long-term fiscal obligations, as well — to pay pension and health benefits to teachers and other public employees, for example, which are currently underfunded by many billions of dollars.
Believe it or not, the deterioration of North Carolina’s balance sheet since the turn of the century has been more than matched by that of other states, where pension funds are in much worse shape and governments borrowed billions of dollars to fund infrastructure projects of little practical value. On a per-person basis, North Carolina had the sixth-lowest debt load in the country as of 2011.
That’s one reason why, according to State Treasurer Janet Cowell’s latest debt-affordability study, North Carolina has the capacity to add $570 million in General Fund debt and $805 million in Highway Fund debt without triggering scrutiny by bond-rating agencies.

To say that we’re not in an Illinois-like debt crisis, however, is not to say that North Carolina ought to take on more debt. Everything else being equal, borrowing is costlier than paying as you go. And every dollar spent on servicing an infrastructure debt is a dollar than can’t be spent on something North Carolinians might value more, such as teacher salaries, community-college training, or tax relief.
Gov. McCrory has yet to formalize the list of projects he’d fund with a $1 billion bond or explain how it would be financed. Conservatives should withhold judgment until he does so. For example, if he proposed to fund light-rail schemes or low-traffic road projects with gas-tax hikes, I’d say no to the deal. If he proposed to fund high-priority roads by ending the annual transfer of Highway Fund revenues to non-highway functions, I might well say yes.
Despite the cost of debt service, borrowing can still be in the interest of taxpayers in the long run if it locks in lower construction costs or speeds the completion of high-value projects with large economic and fiscal payoffs. In such cases, taxpayers gain more in higher incomes than they lose to taxes. But the details matter. Let’s see them.
Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation.

Comments

Comments closed.

Nation/World

Senate Democrats strike deal on jobless aid, move relief bill closer to approval

News

Duke Life Flight pilot may have shut down wrong engine in fatal crash

News

Two NC counties get to participate in satellite internet pilot for students

Local

PETA protesters gather in front of police department

Coronavirus

UPDATED: Eight new COVID-19 deaths, 203 positives reported in county this week

Crime

Sheriff’s office: Two charged after suitcase of marijuana found in Jeep

Crime

Thomasville officer hospitalized after chase that started in Rowan County

Local

Board of elections discusses upgrading voting machines, making precinct changes

News

Lawmakers finalize how state will spend COVID-19 funds

Local

Salisbury Station one of several ‘hot spots’ included in NCDOT rail safety study

Education

Essie Mae Kiser Foxx appeal denied, school considering options

News

Iredell County votes to move Confederate memorial to cemetery

Nation/World

Lara Trump may have eyes on running for a Senate seat

Local

Rowan among counties in Biden’s disaster declaration from November floods

Local

PETA plans protest at Salisbury Police Department on Friday

Education

Essie Mae Kiser Foxx appeal denied, charter revoked

Coronavirus

29 new positives, no new COVID-19 deaths reported

Crime

Blotter: Woman charged with drug crimes

News

Nesting no more: Eagles appear to have moved on from Duke’s Buck Station

Business

The Smoke Pit leaving downtown Salisbury for standalone building on Faith Road

Education

Shoutouts

High School

High school football: Hornets’ Gaither set the tone against West

Local

Salisbury to show off new fire station

Education

Livingstone College to host virtual Big Read events this month