D.G. Martin column: Why doesn’t Hillary give up?
By D.G. Martin
Why doesn’t Hillary quit?
People ask me this question all the time these days.
I have learned to be careful how I answer that question. If my response somehow suggests that either Senator Clinton and Senator Obama is not entitled to the nomination, or not yet entitled to it, I may be in for an argument, one that I would just as soon avoid.
Maybe my answer to the “why won’t she quit” question will make you angry, too. But since I probably will not be around to hear you shouting if I provoke you, I will give you my best answer about why she has not yet thrown in the towel.
There are several reasons she keeps on going even though Senator Obama has a seemingly insurmountable lead convention delegates.
Here is the main reason, the underlying one. She is running for President, if it is not to be now, her quest will continue on into a new election cycle.
In the case of this year’s nominating contest, Obama may be well ahead. But this contest has been a close one, and it is still close. Until one candidate has a majority of the total delegates, it is not really over. Obama has not yet reached this milestone.
Clinton recently got in trouble for reminding us that in other years the nominating process went well into June. But she was absolutely correct to insist that she had a right to continue to campaign, and, perhaps, an obligation to her supporters not to abandon her effort until the matter is finally settled.
Also, though she certainly made a mistake in alluding to the assassination of Bobby Kennedy, it is true that unforeseen circumstances, national or personal to the candidates, could affect the decisions of the unpledged delegates who now have the ultimate power to select the Democratic nominee.
Putting aside the outcome of the current campaign and assuming that Obama wins the nomination, Clinton’s current actions are the building blocks for her next, or continuing, quest for the Presidency.
If she quits the current contest before every primary is over, she will miss the chance to demonstrate and record for the future the full measure of her voter support. If she does lose this time, she wants it to be very, very closeóas close as she can make it be. Next time, she wants to be able to argue that this year’s contest was essentially a tie and that she has earned the right to claim support in 2012 or 2016.
There is something else about next time. She wants to be sure that nobody can ever say that she is quitter. Next time she wants to be able to say, “Support me and there is one thing you can count on. I will never give up, never, never, never give up.”
Perhaps Clinton has in mind Ronald Reagan’s 1976 losing campaign for the Republican nomination. William Link’s recent biography of Jesse Helms, “Righteous Warrior,” describes how Reagan’s campaign to win the nomination from incumbent President Gerald Ford was floundering until the North Carolina primary. Senator Helms and his allies pulled out the stops to give Reagan a victory in our state, one that gave Reagan the momentum to compete, win primaries and delegates, and narrow Ford’s lead.
Still, Ford maintained a lead in delegates as the August convention approached, and Reagan was urged to give up.
Instead, he took the battle to the eve of convention with Helms’ chief political supporter Tom Ellis using creative tactics to shift delegate support to Reagan.
While the effort to nominate Reagan did not succeed at the 1976 convention, his demonstrated strength and fighting spirit helped put him in a position to win the nomination and the election in 1980.
Next time somebody asks me why Clinton does not quit, I think I will just say, “Ronald Reagan,” and then turn and run.
– – –
D.G. Martin is the host of UNC-TV’s North Carolina Bookwatch, which airs Sundays at 5 p.m. Check his blog and view prior programs at www.unctv.org/ncbookwatch/
Candidate should not be ruled out for past I have never met Laura Lyerly. I did hear her speak at... read more