Sports
Bookmark and Share text size: A A A

College Football: Major violations for St. Aug's

Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |



Associated Press

RALEIGH — The NCAA has penalized the athletics program at Saint Augustine's for a lack of institutional control and other major violations.

The Division II Committee on Infractions said Monday that the school allowed 29 ineligible athletes — 15 of them in football — to compete from 2003-04 through 2007-08.

It must vacate all wins in which it used the ineligible players, pay a $2,500 fine, reduce the number of scholarships in seven sports and will be on probation until 2011. Those reductions in 2009-10 and 2010-11 affect the football, men's basketball, softball, volleyball, men's tennis, men's track and women's track teams.

A school spokesman referred requests for comment to Director of Athletic Operations Lewis Card, who did not immediately return a telephone message.

The NCAA said some ineligible athletes received impermissible benefits in the form of scholarships and travel expenses. Some were taking part in their 11th semester of full-time enrollment, one beyond the maximum allowed in Division II. Others were participating in a fifth season or had "deficient" grade-point averages, and the governing body said the school made mistakes while certifying transfers.

The NCAA blamed the school's faulty certification system, which led to errors on eligibility forms, and said the people in charge of tracking eligibility were not educated in its rules. The school showed a lack of instutional control by failing to report an ineligible football player taking part in three games, the NCAA said. It ordered Saint Augustine's to start an external review of its compliance system.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more.




Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
What do you think of the legislature putting parts of Rowan County in three different congressional districts and two state Senate districts?
  • I like it; Rowan will have more members of Congress and the state Senate
  • I don't like it; it's hard enough to figure out who my congressman is
  • I don't care about politics, so it makes no difference to me



 
 
  
  
© 2011 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |