KCR archives | customer service | real estate | autos | jobs | classifieds | place your ad online | Make us your home page
 
 
Opinion

Editorial: Cotton-candy controversy

Sunday, March 22, 2009 3:06 AM  |  Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |


Rowan County Fair officials stirred up a sticky mess regarding a dispute over a vendor's prices for cotton candy and lemonade.

And a lot of it comes down to the definition of "reasonable."

From the comments left on the Salisbury Post's Web site (www.salisburypost.com), a lot of people think that Rhonda Stirewalt's prices for cotton candy, lemonade and tea were perfectly reasonable ("Who said $6 or $7 is a fair price for cotton candy?" one reader asked). However, fair officials viewed it otherwise. They determined that Stirewalt was selling her wares too cheaply, significantly undercutting other vendors. As a result, Stirewalt had to shut down her two concession trailers, which were set up to raise money for a couple of worthy causes: The Nazareth Children's Home and Immanuel Lutheran Church's Vacation Bible School.

After last year's controversy involving management of the fair, this is the last thing fair officials needed — or wanted. While it wouldn't be pretty coming any time, some people find it especially outrageous to crack down on "low" prices when families in this area are struggling to make ends meet, worry about the security of their jobs and have to budget carefully simply to afford family entertainment such as the fair.

When many people already believe they've been gouged on gas prices, feeling pressured by the cotton-candy cartel adds more fuel to the outrage.

However, while chewing over the bitter aftertaste of this, let's not dismiss the perspective of fair officials and those other vendors who don't have the luxury of operating as a non-profit. For some who travel with the fair, this isn't a sideline business or a way to raise money for a favorite cause. It's their livelihood, and they're having to deal with the same economic forces and rising business expenses as everyone else. From that perspective, undercutting the sweet confection competition is similar to someone offering to come in and do your job for half the salary you're being paid. Few of us would sit still for that.

Fair officials say they raised the price issue previously with Stirewalt, although accounts differ on exactly what transpired prior to her banishment. However, one thing's clear. The fair's contracts with vendors should spell out exactly what's meant by "reasonable prices" and how much leeway individual vendors, including non-profit fundraisers, can have. The alternative is more cotton-candy market chaos in the future. Unless, of course, officials decide that letting the midway itself set the price of cotton candy and similar items is the fairest way to go.



Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up



Most Popular Stories
Poll
Do students have too much homework?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure/Don't know



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |