Letters to the editor — Wednesday (6-25-14)

  • Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:14 a.m.

‘Recall’ legislation overdue in NC

North Carolina voters should be allowed, with just cause, to seek a practical “recall” legislation on any election. Let it become reality — now.

Legislators who are currently submitting a proposal requiring 15 percent of the registered voters are self-serving; this is equivalent to denying the voters effectiveness in demanding a legitimate recall.


Excessive requirements by legislators cushion their own political safety in advancing proposed legislation in “tooting their own horn” while pursuing political chatter with little to no real achievement for their voters. Requirements set too high usually die with little change, a mishmash of words only, with no honest provisions for the voters.

Legislators should pursue effective legislation in requiring a minimum of 10 percent and a maximum of 15 percent of the highest votes received in the last election of the affected candidate for recalls.

Most states vary on requirements, but most petitions are based on the last election votes.

Remember, most voter registration record totals are inaccurate by some 3 percent and are higher than actual numbers.

USA Today reports that “Nearly 2.8 million people are registered in two or more states, and perhaps 1.8 million registered voters are dead.”

Recall petitioners should not be required to meet or exceed inaccurate or falsified government election records.

Requiring some 10 percent to 15 percent of the highest votes received in the last election represents solid legislation based on effective recalls with “voter reality” in any jurisdiction.

— Oscar Y. Harward

Locust

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.