Leonard Pitts: Wake up, people, and see the danger we’re in

  • Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:12 a.m.

This is a column about campaign finance reform.

And your eyes glazed over just then, didnít they?


Thatís the problem with this problem. Americans know that government truly of, by and for the people is unlikely if not impossible so long as the system is polluted by billions of dollars in contributions from corporations and individual billionaires. Half of us, according to Gallup, would like to see public financing of campaigns; nearly 80 percent want to limit campaign fund-raising.

And yet somehow, the issue seems to lack a visceral urgency in the public mind. William Ostrander understands that all too well.

ďThere are people that will go nuts over the Second Amendment,Ē he says in a telephone interview. And not to diminish the importance of self-defense, he adds, but ďwhen you look at the practical character of it, whatís going on in campaign finance corruption is far more injurious to their lives, their well-being and their childrenís lives than anything most people have had to deal with with the Second Amendment.Ē

Ostrander is a farmer in tiny San Luis Obispo, Calif., and the director of something called Citizens Congress 2014. Its members include a school teacher, a small-business man, a firefighter, a general contractor and a doctor ó your basic average Americans ó who have collectively invested thousands of volunteer hours to set up a summit (June 2-5) of lawyers, lawmakers, academics, advocacy groups and other experts.

Their aim: to brainstorm strategies and craft a plan of action to eliminate the influence of big money in politics.

Quixotic? Perhaps. But Ostrander says he has commitments from a number of high-profile individuals, including: former labor secretary Robert Reich, Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig; and Trevor Potter, the former chairman of the Federal Election Commission, who is probably best known for his appearances on ďThe Colbert Report,Ē where he helped Stephen Colbert set up a Super PAC.

We should wish them success. Because truth is, while many of us watch with eyes glazed, democracy is being stolen right out from under us.

Consider that last week, the Supreme Court issued a ruling further loosening the limits on campaign donations. Consider the unseemly way four presumptive presidential aspirants ran to Las Vegas to kiss Sheldon Adelsonís ring when the billionaire casino magnate announced he was looking for candidates to support. Consider what billionaire Tom Perkins said in February: Only taxpayers should have the right to vote and the rich should have more votes.

Weíre already moving in that direction.

As new Voter ID laws and other restrictive measures cull the electorate of poor people, brown people and young people, as the Supreme Court further tilts the playing field toward the monied and the privileged, the notion of one person, one vote, the idea that we each have an equal say in the doings of our government, comes to feel ... quaint if not downright naive.

So the politician, though she came to office determined to do right by her constituents, finds she must pay greater attention to the needs of a large donor than to those of the people she was elected to represent.

And you get paradoxes like the one last year, where, although 91 percent of us wanted criminal background checks for all gun sales, somehow that didnít happen, didnít even come close.

Itís not the politiciansí fault, says Ostrander.

ďThere are some really great people in Congress, honestly. Itís the system thatís broken. The system needs an intervention.Ē

And that wonít happen until or unless more Americans wake up from their stupor and recognize this as the clear and present danger it is. Ever feel your government doesnít represent you?

Thatís because it doesnít.

Leonard Pitts is a columnist for The Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Contact him at lpitts@miamiherald.com.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.