Spencer voter turnout picking up, candidates camp out at Town Hall

Emily Ford/Salisbury Post In Spencer, many candidates for Board of Aldermen traditionally spend the whole day in front of Town Hall, greeting voters and hoping to earn their support. Turnout was picking up this afternoon.
Emily Ford/Salisbury Post In Spencer, many candidates for Board of Aldermen traditionally spend the whole day in front of Town Hall, greeting voters and hoping to earn their support. Turnout was picking up this afternoon.

SPENCER — Voters in Spencer are traditionally greeted by many of the candidates themselves, who spend most of the day camped out in front of Town Hall.

Today was no different, with a half-dozen candidates enjoying congenial conversation with each other while waiting for the next voter to appear.


Turnout started slowly but was picking up this afternoon in Spencer, where 181 people had voted at 3:45 p.m.

Thirty-eight people voted early. There are more than 2,200 registered voters in the town.

Turnout in municipal elections, which are held in odd-numbered years, is traditionally low, but new Spencer Chief Judge Tim Norman said he hoped to surpass the turnout total in the 2011 municipal election.

Voter Betsy Rich said she wouldn’t miss the chance to cast a ballot.

“My son is a stickler about voting,” Rich said. “I have the same feeling of responsibility.”

All six incumbent aldermen — Scott Benfield, Kevin Jones, Reid Walters, Jeff Morris, David Smith and Mayor Pro Tem Jim Gobbel — are running for re-election. Challengers Mike Boone and Rashid Muhammad hope to unseat an incumbent.

Mayor Jody Everhart is running unopposed.

Polls are open until 7:30 p.m.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.