S&P upgrades city’s bond rating again

  • Posted: Friday, November 1, 2013 11:45 a.m.

SALISBURY — Standard and Poor’s has upgraded the city of Salisbury’s bond rating for the second time this year.

A city’s bond rating helps measure financial health and influences the cost of borrowing money. On Thursday, S&P upgraded the Salisbury’s general obligation bonds rating from AA- to AA. In their rating opinion, S&P stated the city’s overall budgetary performance has been strong.

In August, S&P upgraded the rating one notch from A+ to AA-.

Two years ago, the city was spending more than it was taking in. Standard & Poor’s said in its August ratings report that the city had reversed that trend and strengthened its financial foundation.

The agency attributed the improvement to management’s actions, including raising revenue and budgeting expenditures more conservatively.

“This is a testament to the continued hard work of our city team over the last two years,” City Manager Doug Paris said. “They have done a great job.”

Standard & Poor’s also commented in both rating opinions about the city’s low level of outstanding debt, which is 1 percent of market value. Both rating opinions also gave a stable future outlook.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.