Huge turnout in favor of proposed central office

  • Posted: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:08 p.m.
    UPDATED: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:58 p.m.

By Emily Ford

SALISBURY — More than 80 people spoke in favor Tuesday of the city’s plan to borrow $8.37 million for the proposed school central office, and dozens more packed City Hall in support.

One person, Dr. Ada Fisher, spoke in opposition of the project and questioned the cost involved to taxpayers.

City Council voted unanimously to pursue the project, which will require approval of the state’s Local Government Commission. If approved, Rowan-Salisbury Schools would make the city’s debt payments on the new building during a 20-year lease agreement.

The school system, which can’t borrow money, does not have a central office even though the city and county school administrations merged more than two decades ago.

The 62,000-square-foot building would stand at 329 S. Main St., beside the $3.2 million headquarters for Integro Technologies and the Salisbury Business Center, which is going up next door.

The project and location have been controversial, but most supporters on Tuesday said the new facility would have the greatest economic impact if placed downtown in a densely populated area.

Many school system employees who work in the dilapidated Long Street administration office — one of five facilities used by school administration employees — spoke about their difficult and unsafe working conditions and thanked City Council for stepping forward.

A majority of Rowan County commissioners declined to fund the project, citing environmental contamination at the site, which has since been resolved. Commissioner Jon Barber, who was in the minority, spoke in favor of the city-school system partnership.

Read more in Wednesday’s Post.

Notice about comments: is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.