NC redistricting judges don’t need more briefs

  • Posted: Friday, June 28, 2013 3:30 p.m.

RALEIGH (AP) — Judges considering arguments in North Carolina’s redistricting litigation have refused a request by attorneys who sued over legislative and congressional district boundaries to file more briefs after the U.S. Supreme Court decisions this week.

A three-judge panel on Friday denied a motion by Democratic voters, election watchdog and civil rights groups who have challenged the maps Republicans drew in 2011. One of the Democrats’ lawyers said Supreme Court opinions on the Voting Rights Act and affirmative action confirm their claims that the lines are the result of racial gerrymandering.


The judges said they do not need more briefs but acknowledged the Supreme Court decisions.

The state judges have received thousands of documents from attorneys and held days of hearings, but have not yet ruled whether the boundaries should be redrawn.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.