GOP fulfills own prediction

  • Posted: Friday, June 7, 2013 7:38 a.m.

When, by a single tie-breaking vote cast by then-Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, the Legislature’s Democratic majority succeeded in pushing through establishment of a state lottery, the Republican majority howled in protest. They correctly predicted that promises of additional money for public education would be broken and that the proceeds would be devoted toward other areas of government.

Though Perdue, as governor, would prove that prediction accurate as she raided the lottery fund to balance her first budget proposal, it is the N.C. Senate — under Republican control — now seeking to eliminate the arrangement entirely. The budget approved last month would radically alter the application of lottery proceeds to public schools, thus fulfilling the GOP’s own prophesy.


When the General Assembly first approved the lottery at the behest of Gov. Mike Easley, it set forth clear goals for where the proceeds would be applied. Under the bill, 50 percent would be used for early education and reducing class size, 40 percent would pay for school construction and 10 percent would pay for need-based scholarships. Since its passage in 2005, the N.C. Education Lottery has generated $2.69 billion for the state, including nearly $40 million for Pitt County.

With North Carolina’s economy reeling from the effects of the national recession, revenue collections plummeted in fiscal year 2008-09. ...

That stands as a massive mistake. So long as no impediment exists to prevent state lawmakers or the governor from diverting lottery funds, North Carolina can expect to see this approach repeated to the detriment of public education.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.