Commissioners could choose defense firm today

  • Posted: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:40 a.m.
    UPDATED: Monday, March 25, 2013 2:00 p.m.

SALISBURY — Rowan County commissioners are expected to choose a law firm today in their defense against a civil rights lawsuit that accused county leaders of violating personal freedoms by opening its meetings with Christian prayer.

Commissioners will meet at 3 p.m. for a closed session hearing in regards to the action filed earlier this month. The American Civil Liberties Union brought the suit on behalf of three Rowan County residents.


Chairman Jim Sides said Monday commissioners will meet with litigators during the closed session. Sides said he hopes to vote on a firm following the hearing.

“We’ll probably vote to retain one of those law firms to represent us in our defense of the ACLU lawsuit,” Sides said.

The civil rights organization accused county administrators of violating the First and 14th amendments by opening meetings with references to Jesus and Christianity. Plaintiffs cite a 2011 Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that said sectarian prayer is unconstitutional.

Rowan residents Nan Lund, Liesa Montag-Siegel and Robert Voelker are named in the suit.

Commissioners have vowed to fight the action, again opening last week’s meeting with sectarian prayer.

Commissioners said the restriction would infringe on their First Amendment rights.

County leaders will meet in the J. Newton Cohen Sr. Room in the Rowan County administration building.

Contact reporter Nathan Hardin at 704-797-4246.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.