Progress, Duke officials questioned on rate hike

  • Posted: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:45 a.m.
    UPDATED: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:03 a.m.

BC-NC--Progress Rate Increase, 1st Ld-Writethru,295

Progress, Duke officials questioned on rate hike

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Critics of a rate increase for Progress Energy customers are questioning deals that would give the utility's largest customers breaks on the costs.


The questions came Monday before the North Carolina Utilities Commission in Raleigh, which is considering a 7.3 percent rate increase for the company's residential customers. That would be nearly $8 per month for the typical residential customer.

Progress promised its industrial customers millions of dollars in price breaks in exchange for their support of its $32 billion merger with Duke Energy.

Duke and Progress considered the deals trade secrets that would have been kept from the public. But the commission opened its files last year following a request from the news media and a Durham advocacy group NC WARN.

Lawyers for commercial businesses, the U.S. Defense Department, the North Carolina League of Municipalities and the North Carolina Public Staff challenged Duke and Progress officials about the price breaks for nearly 4,000 industrial customers. Other Progress customers would make up the difference for the reduced rates for industry.

"Do you gentlemen think it's fair for the Food Lion to subsidize a rate discount to the bakery across the street?" asked Alan Jenkins, an attorney for Harris Teeter, Food Lion, Wal-Mart, Best Buy, J.C. Penney, Macy's and others who would not get the break. "Do you care more about the bakery across the street than the bakery within the Food Lion?"

Two of Duke's top executives, Lloyd Yates, executive vice president for regulated utilities, and Paul Newton, president of Duke Energy North Carolina, defended the breaks for big customers.

The rate breaks would create jobs and help low-income workers become middle class, the men said.

The hearings on the increase could last all week. A decision on the increase request is expected this summer.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.