Davidson County judge tosses lawsuit in sweepstakes case

  • Posted: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 9:55 a.m.

LEXINGTON (AP) — A Davidson County judge dismissed a lawsuit Monday which sought to keep authorities in North Carolina from enforcing a ban on Internet sweepstakes businesses,

The Dispatch of Lexington reports Superior Court Judge Robert Johnson allowed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed last week by two sweepstakes stakeholders in Davidson County.


International Internet Technologies and a local business owner were seeking a preliminary injunction, enjoining authorities from enforcing a sweepstakes ban until a judge could make a ruling about the company’s new software.

The state argued a recent decision by the North Carolina Supreme Court to uphold the sweepstakes ban already decided the matter.

Eddie Caldwell, executive vice president and general counsel to the N.C. Sheriff’s Association, said the association was pleased that the judgment dismissed the lawsuit in its entirety.

“Any law enforcement agency with jurisdiction will be able to enforce the law as the General Assembly wanted them to,” Caldwell said. “Judge Johnson has recommended that the General Assembly and the Supreme Court meant exactly what they said.”

Attorneys for the plaintiffs left the courtroom without commenting on the decision.

A turning point in the hearing came from Jerry Kontos, an assistant city attorney for Winston-Salem. Kontos testified that the IIT system demonstrated at the hearing was not the same as what he had seen the company use in Forsyth County.

Kontos said between Jan. 17 and Jan. 23, he visited a business that used IIT software that used a display that was similar to that of a slot machine. The slot machine format was static until the “reveal” button is clicked, Kontos said. Then, it reels and comes to a stop, he said.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.