Political notebook: Hudson co-sponsors his first two bills

  • Posted: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:49 p.m.
U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson speaks to members of the Rowan County Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday during his first visit as a congressman. Hudson was elected in the fall to represent North Carolina's 8th district. Photo by Karissa Minn, Salisbury Post.
U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson speaks to members of the Rowan County Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday during his first visit as a congressman. Hudson was elected in the fall to represent North Carolina's 8th district. Photo by Karissa Minn, Salisbury Post.

U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson has signed his name to two bills so far in his first month as North Carolina’s 8th District Congressman.

This week, Hudson co-sponsored the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act.


The bill, introduced in the U.S. House by Rep. Todd Young of Indiana, includes 121 co-sponsors.

In a press release, Hudson said it is “an effort to restore a measure of accountability for federal regulations.”

The REINS Act would require that any regulation with an economic impact of $100 million or more come before Congress for a vote before taking effect. It passed the House overwhelmingly in the 112th Congress but never received a hearing in the Senate.

Hudson also announced last week that he has co-sponsored H.R. 3600, a bill to repeal the 1954 Johnson Amendment.

The Johnson Amendment was inserted in a tax bill by then-Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson to prevent nonprofit organizations from intervening in political campaigns.

Hudson, a member of the Congressional Prayer Caucus, said the Internal Revenue Service has interpreted the law too broadly. Churches can face the loss of their tax-exempt status if pastors speak from the pulpit about political candidates or issues.

Hudson said in a press release that the new legislation would “restore free speech rights of houses of worship and other non-profit organizations.”

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.