Update: Pierce says he will pray, despite lawsuit

  • Posted: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:27 a.m.
    UPDATED: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:57 a.m.
Robert Voelker, Liesa Montag-Siegel and Nan Lund stand on the stairs in the Rowan County Administration Building. These same steps were used last year as a platform by supporters of the Rowan County commissioners and their continuined use of sectarian prayers during public meetings. Voelker, Montag-Siegel and Lund are plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Rowan County in federal court Tuesday.
Robert Voelker, Liesa Montag-Siegel and Nan Lund stand on the stairs in the Rowan County Administration Building. These same steps were used last year as a platform by supporters of the Rowan County commissioners and their continuined use of sectarian prayers during public meetings. Voelker, Montag-Siegel and Lund are plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Rowan County in federal court Tuesday.

Update: Rowan Commission Vice Chairman Craig Pierce said he will deliver a Christian prayer at Monday’s Board of Commissioners meeting, despite receiving notice of a lawsuit filed against the county by the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Tuesday.

Pierce told the Post his speech at county meetings is protected by the First Amendment and not a violation of civil rights as alleged by the ACLU.

“I’ve prayed all my life, I’m not going to change now,” Pierce said. “If I’m told by the courts that I can’t pray in session, then we’ll have to accommodate that ...”

Pierce said he isn’t sure what to expect from the public Monday, noting that he was in attendance last March as dozens of supporters filled the county building with hymns and support.

“I understand this is a passionate issue for the citizens, We’re not calling for a crowd. We’re not asking people to come out,” Pierce said. “As long as the citizens feel it’s a need then it’s more than welcome. I want them to show their support for any issue.”

All five commissioners have vowed to continue starting meetings with sectarian prayer. In the lawsuit, the ACLU seeks a preliminary injunction to immediately force commissioners to stop.

Pierce said he sees the publicity and the lawsuit as part of a broader issue.

“The biggest thing here is I don’t think this is all about Rowan County,” he said. “This is a bigger movement and we just happen to be the target.”

SALISBURY — The American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina filed a lawsuit Tuesday accusing county commissioners of violating the First Amendment by beginning meetings with sectarian prayer.

The ACLU brought the action more than a year after Rowan commissioners thumbed their noses at a warning letter authored by the civil rights organization. That letter asked board members to cease and desist prayer that favored one religion, which it said was unconstitutional.

Three Rowan County residents — Nan Lund, Liesa Montag-Siegel and Bob Voelker — are listed as plaintiffs in the suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Greensboro.

“These are elected officials delivering prayers that value one set of beliefs over another,” said Chris Brook, legal director for ACLU North Carolina.

The lawsuit asks for a preliminary injunction requiring commissioners to stop the sectarian prayer. It also asks for a permanent injunction, that the county pay $1 in damages and that Rowan pay the ACLU’s legal fees.

In a meeting with Post editors and reporters Tuesday, Lund, Montag-Siegel and Voelker said the board’s opening prayer not only makes them feel excluded, but has also impaired their advocacy on other issues.

Lund said she has regularly attended commissioners meetings since moving to Rowan County in 2001.

“I was immediately struck by the nature of the opening prayer and felt like either I had to be a little disingenuous and go through the motions — standing for the prayer, bowing my head and so on, which felt not true to myself — or to be conspicuous by not doing that,” Lund said. “So I felt unwelcome, and I felt like it was an uncomfortable situation for me and not one that I freely would participate in.”

Lund declined to discuss her religious views.

The lawsuit details a typical commission meeting, noting that attendees are asked to stand for the prayer and pledge of allegiance.

“Defendant’s invocation practice has the primary purpose and effect of promoting and advancing one particular faith, Christianity,” the lawsuit states.

ACLU officials said they waited a year to file to give county leaders time to comply with the requests.

The ACLU penned a letter to Rowan commissioners Feb. 15, 2012, citing a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that ruled county meetings could not begin with sectarian prayer.

In the 2011 case of Joyner v. Forsyth County Board of Commissioners, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III ruled prayer should be non-denominational and should “send a signal of welcome, rather than exclusion.”

“... Prayer in governmental settings carries risks,” Wilkinson wrote in his decision. “The proximity of prayer to official government business can create an environment in which the government prefers — or appears to prefer — particular sects or creeds at the expense of others.”

But in a sea of Christian supporters who prayed and sang hymns at the next meeting on March 5, 2012, county leaders scoffed at the warning.

In an e-mail to other county commissioners last spring, Jim Sides called the warning “ridiculous.”

“I will continue to pray in JESUS name,” Sides wrote. “Chairman (Chad) Mitchell, I volunteer to be the first to go to jail for this cause ... and if you will go my bail in time for the next meeting, I will go again!”

Reached by phone Tuesday, Sides, who is now chairman of the board, said the commissioners may discuss the lawsuit at Monday’s meeting.

“It kindly depends on what the lawyer thinks we ought to do,” Sides said, adding that County Attorney Jay Dees had emailed commissioners making them aware of the suit.

“My position hasn’t changed, probably won’t change,” he said.

Sides said Vice Chairman Craig Pierce is slated to give Monday’s invocation.

Pierce could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

Commissioner Jon Barber told the Post he expected the litigation.

“I’m not surprised. When they first informed our attorney in February of last year our practice was illegal, we just continued the practice,” Barber said. “I anticipated the point that we would hear from them again.”

The lawsuit says that 139 out of 143 board meetings from Nov. 5, 2007, through the present began with sectarian prayer.

The four non-sectarian prayers were delivered by former Commissioner Raymond Coltrain, the lawsuit said.

Board members’ prayers have varied in style, the suit said, closing with phrases like, “in the name of Jesus, the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords,” “in the name of our Risen Lord, Jesus Christ,” and sometimes simply, “in Jesus’ name.”

Commissioner Mike Caskey wasn’t on the board in 2012 when county leaders received the letter. But he said Tuesday he would fight to continue the Christian prayers.

“I’m not going to change anything ... I think it’s our freedom of speech and freedom of religion to say whatever we want,” Caskey said.

He added that he thinks the ACLU — whose officials said they’ve received more complaints about Rowan commissioners than those any other county — were doing it for the money.

“They’re just doing it for publicity,” he said, “just trying to make a living suing people.”

In an email response Tuesday evening, Mike Meno, communications director for the ACLU, said the organization responds to complaints from North Carolina residents and doesn’t operate for monetary gain.

“... We are a non-profit organization whose stated mission is to defend the constitutional rights of all North Carolinians,” he said. “We only take action in cases when we receive a complaint from a local resident.”

Following the Forsyth County court decision, more than 20 counties in North Carolina changed their prayer policies to reflect the law, said Brook, the ACLU attorney.

Montag-Siegel, who moved to Rowan County in 1994 with her family, called the commissioners’ prayers “deliberately unwelcoming.”

“I don’t think that a government agency that’s elected and holding a meeting should set up an atmosphere that excludes anyone,” she said.

Montag-Siegel, who is Jewish, said a Jewish prayer would make the meetings equally uncomfortable for others.

“I think that it wouldn’t help if they were starting every meeting with a Shema,” she said. “It would be just as uncomfortable and would be excluding to a whole other group of people.”

Voelker said he opposed the prayer last spring and suggested an alternative prayer that was used by another elected group.

But, aside from Coltrain, he said, it fell on deaf ears.

“It was after I addressed the council in the public comment session that Mr. Coltrain began altering his prayer policy,” Voelker said, “So he attempted to comply with that, but none of the others chose to.”

Commissioner Chad Mitchell said he doesn’t see the pending litigation as a distraction for a board dealing with several issues, including its request that state legislators de-annex the Rowan County airport.

“I really can’t say what the board as a whole is going to do moving forward,” Mitchell said. “My preference is we continue doing as we’ve been doing. I don’t see it as a violation of the law.”

But Brook, the ACLU attorney, said if commissioners choose to ignore the lawsuit, he hopes an injunction will force them to change their policy while a possibly lengthy court battle proceeds.

“... There has been, is currently, and we have reason to believe will continue to be violations of the First Amendment here,” he said. “Those violations need to be addressed in a timely fashion.”

Contact reporter Nathan Hardin at 704-797-4246.

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Do not post the following:

  • Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults or threats.
  • The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
  • Comments unrelated to the story.