Sports
Bookmark and Share text size: A A A

Limits sought on Hatteras beach driving

Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |



From staff and wire reports

BUXTON — Vehicles would be allowed year-round access to about 40 percent of an Outer Banks beach popular with fishers and outdoor enthusiasts, under a proposal released last week by the National Park Service.

The 700-page plan said drivers would be able to use 29 miles of Cape Hatteras National Seashore, with some limits during the breeding periods of sea birds. Off-road vehicles would be able to access another 23 miles of the 68-mile seashore during some parts of the year.

About 16 miles would be permanently closed to vehicles.

The new rules are an attempt to settle a dispute between environmental activists who want to protect seashore animals and outdoors groups who want access to the beach for recreational activities. The government will hold public hearings on the matter and has proposed several other alternatives to its preferred plan.

Conservation groups said in a statement Friday that they were reviewing the plan. They noted that a plan that the Park Service deemed "environmentally preferable" would have closed 41 miles of the seashore.

"We will be examining the alternatives closely and will urge the park service to choose a management plan that protects the wildlife resources of Cape Hatteras for generations to come," said Jason Rylander, staff attorney for Defenders of Wildlife.

At issue is whether the document's rules balance the interests of off-road vehicle enthusiasts with the park service's primary responsibility to preserve the seashore's natural resources, including rare sea turtles, birds and their young.

As a unit of the National Park System, Cape Hatteras has been required for decades under federal law to establish guidelines for off-road vehicles that minimize harm to wildlife and natural values of the seashore in accordance with the best available science.

"We look forward to working with the park service to ensure compliance with legal and scientific requirements to guarantee adequate space and protections for pedestrians and wildlife, while still allowing responsible beach driving in some areas, so that all visitors can fully enjoy this national treasure," said Julie Youngman, senior attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center. "The final rules should improve public access to the beaches for pedestrians and people with disabilities by adding boardwalks, parking spaces and public facilities to enhance visitor enjoyment in balance with wildlife conservation efforts."

The park service's preferred plan in the proposal sets aside 16 miles of the 68 miles of seashore year-round as non-vehicle areas for pedestrians, families and wildlife.

"The past two years under the consent decree have proven that, if given a chance, birds and turtles can rebound, local tourism can be sustained and responsible recreation can have a place within Cape Hatteras," said Chris Canfield, executive director of Audubon North Carolina, referring to a settlement agreement approved in federal court in 2008. "With strong leadership from the Park Service and cooperation from local communities, Cape Hatteras can become a national example of balanced, progressive management."

The rules will also likely be reviewed by many scientific experts on species conservation. This winter, nearly 100 scientists signed a letter urging the National Park Service to implement the U.S. Geological Survey's recommended protocols to managing beach driving for the protection of nesting birds and turtles.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more.




Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
What do you think of the legislature putting parts of Rowan County in three different congressional districts and two state Senate districts?
  • I like it; Rowan will have more members of Congress and the state Senate
  • I don't like it; it's hard enough to figure out who my congressman is
  • I don't care about politics, so it makes no difference to me



 
 
  
  
© 2011 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |