Sponsored by: Ben Mynatt Nissan | Archive Search
Opinion

Editorial: U.S. automakers aren't alone

E-mail to a friend



Local car dealers have a point when they lament that fear about the future, perhaps even more than economic reality, is driving down car sales. Even people with steady paychecks and, presumably, the ability to secure financing are reluctant to commit to a major purchase when they wonder how much worse this downturn may get — or how long it will last. Nobody knows, and when traveling in the dark, people are a lot more likely to step cautiously than make a headlong rush down an unfamiliar path.

Here's another point the dealers could make: While the U.S. auto industry has seen its market share erode over the years, it has become a scapegoat for industrial ills that extend beyond the automotive sector and involve government policies (an outdated fuel taxation strategy and ineffective corporate mileage mandates, for instance) as much as managerial ineptness. Domestic automakers and worker unions certainly aren't blameless for the industry's predicament, and they need a detailed restructuring plan, but what's happening in the U.S. auto industry shouldn't be viewed in isolation from what's happening around the world. Detroit's Big Three aren't the only car companies facing big questions about future profitability:

- Toyota, the world's largest automaker, expects to sell about 400,000 fewer cars in the United States this year. Although it has a healthy cushion of cash and projects total profit this year of about $5.5 billion, that's about a third of last year's earnings.

- Nissan's U.S. auto sales dropped 33 percent in October, prompting the company to cut its profit forecast for the year.

- Honda reported a 41 percent drop in quarterly profit, forcing Japan's second-biggest automaker to lower its forecasts for the year.

- BMW, the prestigious German brand, saw its third quarter profit plunge by 63 percent.

- Kia Motors' stock price recently fell to its lowest level in more than five years on concerns that repaying a $378-million debt may leave the Korean automaker short of cash.

- Jaguar-Land Rover, which was purchased by India's Tata Motors from Ford Motor Co. earlier this year, reportedly is seeking $1.5 billion in government aid from the British government.

Make no mistake — the major domestic automakers are in a much worse position than companies like Toyota and Honda, which can draw on substantial cash reserves. When GM executives raise the possibility of bankruptcy, they aren't crying wolf. But it's a distortion of market conditions to suggest their plight is simply the result of bad decisions or inferior products. Just as a dose of economic history might help Americans realize that we're nowhere near Great Depression-era hardships, a broader perspective could also help frame the debate over extending government aid to automakers. Many other automotive manufacturers around the world are suffering, too. Don't be surprised if the requests for financial help coming from Detroit aren't soon echoed in the corridors of power elsewhere.





Comments (3)

What do you think? Post your comment below.

Comments


(Requires free registration.)

SalisburyPost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse.

SalisburyPost.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not SalisburyPost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please send us an email to webmaster@salisburypost.com with the article title and offensive post's contents and we will review it for possible removal.

Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Fed Up
Unions are partly to blame : Wednesday, November 26, 2008 8:55 AM

There should be no bail out of the big 3 auto makers. The UAW years ago saddled them with onerous labor contracts that now pay thousands of workers to do nothing. The bail out will likely allow the same old sorry execs to remain in place. They need to be kicked out. Localyokel is right. If they are bailed out, everybody and his brother will be asking for bail out money. Some cities are already doing so.
Report Abuse

Localyokel
Where is the money gonna come from? : Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:16 AM

The author of this article thinks other companies with be asking for bailout money before it's all said and done. If we bail out the Big Three guess what, he's right! Free money! Let me have some. The big three are mostly to blame for their plight. Not partly. Everyone, and I mean everyone in those companies is overpaid. Talk about greed. $70 an hour (including benefits) for line workers. The salary scheme is unreal. No wonder Toyota is doing better. They make better vehicles too. An exec of GM on CNN said last week that a bailout would see them through until spring of 2010. What then? 1 year and then it's back to gov't handouts. I say no way. Let them merge together or come up with there own solutions.
Report Abuse

Budget Analyst
Corporate welfare need not be in the billions or tens of billions : Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:29 AM

I remember on January 16, 2006, county commissioners unanimously approved $12.5 million in "Industrial Revenue Bonds" in order to allow for the low-interest expansion of two local businesses. It was a very low cost to the county (under $3000 per bond, according to the NC Dept. of Commerce), and said to be no liability to the taxpayers. It would be interesting to see the status of those expanded companies nearly three years later. Have they fared better than their counterparts which did not get those large capital infusions? Are they now employing MORE employees than in 2006? Or fewer employees?
Report Abuse

 

Other Headlines
Letters to the editor - Thursday (1-8-09)
Posted on Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:38 PM

Leonard Pitts: 'Gran Torino' drives home a point
Posted on Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:38 PM

Letters to the editor - Wednesday (1-7-09)
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:48 PM

Editorial: Safety rule too broad?
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:48 PM

John Hood column: Rand was just being honest
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:48 PM

Letter: Columnist Thomas off-base on religion
Posted on Monday, January 05, 2009 9:58 PM

Editorial: Billions here, billions there
Posted on Monday, January 05, 2009 9:58 PM

Scott Mooneyham: Tough talk from Perdue
Posted on Sunday, January 04, 2009 1:58 AM

Verner column: Plugging into new energy sectors
Posted on Friday, January 02, 2009 4:39 PM

Editorial: Don't stop at the stars
Posted on Friday, January 02, 2009 4:39 PM




Daily Deals

Today's Newspaper Ads

Announcements
Automotive & Vehicles
Community
Home Improvement & Gardening
Real Estate & Rentals
Services
Apparel & Jewelry
Business & Finance
Dining & Entertainment
Medical
Recreation
Shopping

Website Forms

Birth Announcement
Birthdays
Business News
Celebrations Forms
Employee News
Feedback
Graduations
Hold your paper delivery
Letter to the Editor
Mailing List
Sponsorship
Subscribe
Worship directory submission

Special Sections

A Day In The Life
Autos Only Baby of the Year
Biotech 101
Bridal Page
Celebrations
Explorer
Faith 4th
Living Here
NC Statewide Classified Line Ad Network
Pops at the Post
Prime Time
Shop Local
Spring Home Improvement
Summer Fun
Taste of Home
Worship Directory

View All