|
Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:00 AM
E-mail to a friend
October 2030, scenario 1:You awake at home, on a cul-de-sac carved from a former farm. Maybe you're in Stanly County, or maybe Union or Rowan or York County.
At 6:30 a.m. you head out of your driveway, and you brace yourself for your two-hour commute to Charlotte along perennially clogged Albemarle Road. Or the new Monroe Bypass, or Interstate 85 or I-77.
The state can't build new bypasses or new interstate lanes fast enough to keep up with the traffic that pours onto them, as more and more subdivisions go up. And unlike many large U.S. and most foreign cities, there's still no mass transit alternative.
Traffic crawls. You have plenty of time to stare out at empty big box stores built only 10 years ago, surrounded by huge, empty parking lots. How fast things change.
Your mind wanders to the weekend and thoughts of Lake Norman. But you grimace, remembering the traffic you'd contend with. Family time? You're spending four hours a day driving. Weekends, you're driving the kids to their activities. Family income? A growing chunk goes to $10-a-gallon gasoline. Maybe, you muse, you should have taken that job out west in Denver – any place where life is more manageable – and pleasant.
October 2030, scenario 2:7 a.m. and you roll out of bed in your charming solar-powered bungalow in a Gastonia neighborhood. Or maybe you're in Pineville or Mooresville. You grab a fast breakfast, then your husband drops you at the light rail line on Franklin Boulevard. Or the one on South Boulevard, or Mooresville's Main Street as you head to your job in uptown Charlotte.
From the window, you watch streets, homes, parks and businesses pass. As you read a new book, you think of the extra cash your family has now that you sold the second car, and you relish seeing the growing independence of your 12-year-old daughter. Now she's bicycling and walking on her own to school, piano lessons and friends' houses, and on rainy days she takes the bus. Your house is modest, with a small backyard, but you've gotten to know your neighbors, and you're happy there. This weekend, you'll take the family on a drive into farm country, or maybe head to an international festival in uptown Charlotte. By Alex Marshall and Neal Peirce
For the Salisbury Post
The Charlotte region has a big choice. The two scenarios described at leftprove it. Should the region keep sprawling outward, adding endless asphalt, subdivisions, malls and big boxes — and gruesome Atlanta-style traffic congestion?
Or should it invest in train and bus lines connecting a constellation of walkable, friendly neighborhoods along with a variety of business districts? This scenario puts high value on preserving the region's "green lungs" – farms, forests, pathways, environmental breathing space. Growth efforts focus on Charlotte's existing neighborhoods and town centers and the historic ring cities such as Rock Hill, Salisbury and Monroe. Commuter rail is used for longer connections, bus and light rail for shorter ones.
In this scenario, auto travel doesn't end — it simply yields its total supremacy to transit, allowing compact neighborhoods where residents don't need to drive for every trip. As in other world cities, driving is an option, not a necessity.
The skinny tracks of the new Lynx line have succeeded in transforming Charlotte's national image from one of endless suburbia surrounding tall bank towers to a city moving to 21st-century mobility and sustainability. Now's the time to build on that historic breakthrough.
Ridership on the LYNX Blue Line — 16,000 weekday trips in July and August — is well ahead of projections, boosted by high gas prices and a gas shortage the past few weeks from Hurricane Ike. It has stimulated an estimated $1.86 billion worth of new housing development and has lured such top firms as Cherokee Partners.
Public enthusiasm is high. But what comes next?
The Charlotte Area Transit System has a decent, multi-line plan. But it has a huge problem: slow timing.
Five years must pass before the Blue Line is completed up North Tryon Street, past UNC Charlotte to I-485. The first phase of the Purple Line (north toward Mooresville) opens in 2012 but completion isn't scheduled until 2019. A Silver Line (southeast corridor) opens in stages from 2022 to 2026. And the associated streetcar line extension to Charlotte/Douglas International Airport won't happen until 2034, more than a quarter century away.
That's an intolerably long time — and not just because one of the authors of this series would have to live to 102 to see the full build-out!
Now is the moment for this big, bustling, historically confident region to order a rapid speed-up and plan for more lines — additional ones in Mecklenburg County with negotiations to extend lines into neighboring counties.
How to do it? Charlotte needs to pull a Denver.
Limited light rail began there in the '90s, but voters decisively rejected the transit agency's 1997 proposal for a multibillion-dollar expansion.
With painstaking negotiations and planning, a coalition of the Greater Denver Chamber of Commerce and environmental leaders, the transit agency and the region's mayors — 31 in all — conceived and endorsed a regionwide system of six lines, 119 miles with 50 stations, including Denver's airport. The expanded system had a stunning $4.7 billion cost, to be financed through a sales tax boost with no assurance of federal support.
In November 2004, despite strong opposition from Colorado's governor, conservative think tanks and auto dealers, the voters overwhelmingly approved.
The payoff: The Denver region is fast developing an extensive and popular alternative to getting around by car. Multiple billions of dollars of new investment are reported along the new lines — likely enough, through a few years' taxes, to pay back Fastracks' cost, which with inflation is now estimated at $7.9 billion.
Don't discount the audacity factor. Denver has become famed nationwide for its civic nerve and leadership, beacons to capital and talented youth. And it's not just Denver. Last month, Toronto announced a whopping $50 billion expansion plan for its rapid transit system to be built over several decades. Houston, Dallas, Phoenix and San Jose, Calif. — historically car-oriented Sun Belt cities — have all to some extent started organizing their growth around new transit lines.
So if Denver, Toronto, Dallas and Phoenix, why not Charlotte?
To make it easier, why not a new chapter in North Carolina transportation policy?
We were surprised to hear a father of North Carolina's modern-day highway system — former state Rep. Sam Hunt, a former N.C. DOT secretary — make that very case.
Hunt authored the 1989 transportation bill that aided sprawl by authorizing beltways around every major N.C. city.
But Charlotte's new Lynx line, said Hunt, has "changed the dynamics of the discussion. They went in and did something proper and right, spent enough money to make it an efficient line, and people are riding it. Development is coming around that line. ÉAny time you have a success you can point to, you have something you can emulate."
So Hunt supports a bill, introduced by Rep. Becky Carney, D-Mecklenburg, and Sen. Richard Stevens, R-Wake, that would let urban North Carolina counties do what Mecklenburg County did — hold a referendum to authorize a local tax to finance a transit system and commit the state to help pay for it once local funds are committed.
The next Charlotte breakthrough — not just completing and expanding today's lines, but getting surrounding counties to join — will again hinge on such legislation. The Lynx system wouldn't even exist if Mecklenburg leaders, including Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory, hadn't mobilized to travel to Raleigh in 1997 to get state permission for a local tax referendum. With its careful political work at the state level by many committed transit supporters, Charlotte created the precedent that may now be key for it — and other metro areas across North Carolina.
Similar careful and steady political groundwork at state level — this time by the entire region —will be needed to make an accelerated transit system happen.
Related Stories
Citistates Report: Several clues to downtown success
Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:00 AM
Citistates Report: Charlotte's uptown, outlying downtowns share vital connections
Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:00 AM
What do you think? Post your comment below.
Comments
SalisburyPost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse.
SalisburyPost.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not SalisburyPost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please send us an email to webmaster@salisburypost.com with the article title and offensive post's contents and we will review it for possible removal.
Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Leave us alone
NO to citystates report : Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:19 PM
How about if all you "central planners" just leave us common people alone? We would all be better off if you were unemployed and found a job that contributes to our society inste4ad of trying to tell the rest of us what we aught to do.
Report Abuse
Jarrod
Wanna live in a Gastonia "bungalow" : Monday, October 13, 2008 10:15 PM
This is more of the ridiculous notion that our government should force us to spread the misery equally. It is the 'social justice' goal of the regional "CONNECT Vision" promulgated by Centralina Council of Governments. Sad.
Report Abuse
Say NO to socialism
Say yes to Freedom : Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 AM
Forcing people to do what the central planners want is already done in several countries around the world. North Korea is one, Cuba is another, and so is Russia. Do we want to follow their example? I hope not. Taking away our cars and roads will make us all more dependent on the central planners (government).
Report Abuse
RPR
Smart Growth's agenda is to make driving less desirable : Sunday, October 12, 2008 11:04 PM
Jerry, not only are you right, but the John Locke Society explains your theory in great detail at: http://www.johnlocke.org/agenda2004/smartgrowth.html
Report Abuse
Jerry
Transportation only one part of the equation. : Sunday, October 12, 2008 10:47 AM
What this article doesn't address is the draconian restrictions that leaders will have to put on property rights, in order to force people into crowded neighborhoods. It also doesn't address the Smart Growth proponents' tactic of disallowing any future road widenings, to deliberately force families to give up on driving automobiles. The traffic in an area committed to Smart Growth's core principles is designed to be so immobile that people will choose mass transit. Otherwise, who wouldn't want to drive on wider roads on their own schedule, instead of riding the bus? Think about alternative #3 by 2030, where there's no road congestion, because we didn't give away half our transportation dollars needed for road widening to a mass transit system where (if WILDLY successful, like in New York City) you'd have ten percent ridership. That leaves the other 90% still stuck behind the wheel in standstill traffic. Does THAT make alot of sense?
Report Abuse
|