customer service | place your ad online | mobile | make us your home page
 
 
Opinion

Wednesday, August 05, 2009 3:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |

Scripps Howard News Service

One of the more obnoxious tactics of the left, especially the student left, during the 1960s and '70s was to disrupt the meetings of those with whom they disagreed — on the war, race, feminism, whatever — until finally the targeted speaker gave up and left.

You would have hoped we had learned our lesson, but apparently not.

With funding and staff support from advocacy groups opposed to health-care reform and to the Obama administration, organized groups have been showing up at congressional town-hall meetings held mostly by Democrats in favor of health-care reform.

The protesters jeer, heckle, wave placards, shout over the speaker and carry on much like the student radicals of yore. Memos that have cropped up on the Web show that these protests are not intended to be any kind of dialogue but purely disruptive, preferably ending with the member of Congress forced to retreat. Videos of the demonstrations almost immediately appear on the Internet. The idea is to make opposition to health-care reform seem more widespread than it really is.

Indeed, the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee plans to publicize the disruptions as "Recess Roastings — Washington Democrats Feel the Heat at Home."

It has happened to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Sen. Arlen Specter, Rep. Patrick Murphy and Rep. Lloyd Doggett. Rep. Frank Kratovil was hung in effigy outside his office, perhaps not coincidentally while an advocacy group opposed to health-care reform was meeting in his Maryland district.

The Democrats dismiss the demonstrators as the Republican fringe, birthers, tea baggers and assorted wing nuts. However, surely many of those who show up for these outbursts are sincerely motivated in their fear of health-care reform. And, the fact is, what happens while the lawmakers are in their districts for the August recess is critical to what happens this fall.

However, it is impossible to dismiss the large quotient of manufactured outrage in these disruptions. The campaign smacks of what political operatives call "Astroturf" — fake grass roots.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up

You can login to your existing account to make changes to your profile by clicking here.


Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
The website wikileaks.org recently published more than 90,000 government documents the site received from an anonymous source. The sites founder, Julian Assange, claims the documents expose "war crimes" committed by the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan. Do you think the documents should have been published?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Undecided



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |