KCR archives | customer service | real estate | autos | jobs | classifieds | place your ad online | Make us your home page
 
 
Opinion

Other voices: Highway Patrol and dogs don't mix

Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:04 AM  |  Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |


The News & Observer of Raleigh

Bryan Beatty, secretary of the state Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, may have had little choice but to suspend a canine program of the state Highway Patrol in the wake of some scandalous training techniques, but at least he did it. The program will be reviewed.

Truth is, as useful as dogs can be in investigating drug and property crimes, maintaining the program just might not be worth it at this point. The patrol, in the wake of behavioral scandals involving some troopers, has had to fire Sgt. Charles L. Jones for mistreating a dog.

Another trooper had shot cell phone footage of Jones suspending his dog, Ricoh, from a railing, then kicking him repeatedly. Jones' excuse, given during a hearing over his attempts to get his job back, was that he didn't hurt the dog and that other rough training techniques had been used.

Other troopers who testified said they hadn't abused dogs, but said dogs had been shocked with stun guns, kicked, suspended from their leashes until they were nearly unconscious and hit with plastic bottles filled with stones. The defense offered for such training by troopers was that these are big, aggressive dogs that can hurt people, and thus they must be so trained.

That just doesn't hold up, either with other experts on dog training or with the public. Many people who saw the video of Jones understandably were shocked by it — evidently including Governor Easley.

The canine program right now is where it needs to be — inactive. If Beatty can come up with some reliable way to ensure that animals are trained in a humane manner, then perhaps it can be restored. But not now, and maybe not ever.


Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up



Most Popular Stories
Poll
Should the Rowan/Salisbury school board continue working on redistricting or leave things the way they are?
  • Continue working on the plan.
  • Leave things the way they are.



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |