customer service | place your ad online | mobile | make us your home page
 
 
News

Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |

Dr. Mihai Mehedint works at UNC Nutrition Research Institute, which discovered a link between choline and blood vessel development in the brains of mouse pups.

By Emily Ford

eford@salisburypost.com

KANNAPOLIS — Pregnant mice with diets lacking the essential nutrient choline had fetuses with fewer brain blood vessels, according to a study at the N.C. Research Campus.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Nutrition Research Institute in Kannapolis conducted the mouse study.

The findings, published in the journal “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,” could be important to women.

“Most pregnant women in the United States have diets that are choline deficient,” Dr. Steve Zeisel, director of the UNC Nutrition Research Institute, said in a statement. “Only 14 percent of expecting mothers in the U.S. are eating enough choline in their diet.”

Pregnant women with the lowest amount of choline in their diets are four times more likely to have babies with birth defects than are women who eat the most choline.

Choline-rich foods include milk, egg yolks, soybeans, beef, chicken, peanuts, wheat germ, flax seeds, sesame seeds, potatoes, cauliflower, lentils and oats.

To test whether choline directly affects fetal blood vessel formation, Zeisel and colleagues including Dr. Mihai Mehedint fed choline-deficient diets to pregnant mice and then examined the brains of the pups.

The researchers report that choline-deficient fetal mice had fewer hippocampal blood vessels than the control group, which was fed a normal diet.

The choline-deficient diet also correlated to high levels of two growth factors that regulate new blood vessel formation.

Previous studies link diets low in choline to a decreased production of nerve cells in the brain of fetal mice. Choline regulates the genes that make stem cells divide.

Contact Emily Ford at 704-797-4264.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up

You can login to your existing account to make changes to your profile by clicking here.


Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
A new state health rule gives restaurants the option of permitting dogs and cats in outdoor dining areas, so long as the pets are on leashes or otherwise restrained. What do you think of allowing pets in outdoor dining areas?
  • Definitely a tail-wagging idea.
  • Makes me want to barf.
  • I'll have to chew on it a while before deciding.



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |