customer service | place your ad online | mobile | make us your home page
 
 
News

Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |


WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman Larry Kissell has sponsored the Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act in an effort to end insurance company monopolies.

The two-page bill, introduced Tuesday, amends the 1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act by repealing the blanket antitrust exemption afforded to health insurance companies, whether organized as for profit or nonprofit entities.

"Health insurance companies are the only entities other than Major League Baseball to enjoy an antitrust exemption. This is unacceptable," Kissell said in a press release. "We need to correct this inequity to protect consumers and allow for competition in the marketplace. Competition drives our economy and spurs innovation while ensuring the marketplace is fair for consumers. The antitrust exemption has allowed insurers to fix prices, make agreements not to pay, conspire to underpay doctors and hospitals, and divide the market in a non-competitive way. All of these practices are detrimental to consumers, and to our economy, and it is time for it to stop."

The Health Industry Fair Competition Act is designed to restore competition and transparency to the health insurance market, according to the press release. The bill would allow antitrust agencies such as U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission the authority to investigate any evidence of anti-competitive practices. It makes no changes to state-based system of insurance regulation and taxation.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up

You can login to your existing account to make changes to your profile by clicking here.


Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
A new state health rule gives restaurants the option of permitting dogs and cats in outdoor dining areas, so long as the pets are on leashes or otherwise restrained. What do you think of allowing pets in outdoor dining areas?
  • Definitely a tail-wagging idea.
  • Makes me want to barf.
  • I'll have to chew on it a while before deciding.



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |