- customer service
- place your ad online
- mobile
- e-mail alerts
- Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Printer friendly version |
E-mail to a friend |
By Karissa Minn
kminn@salisburypost.com
The League of Conservation Voters has given extreme and opposite scores to U.S. Reps. Mel Watt and Howard Coble for their environmental records this year.
The group's 2009 National Environmental Scorecard includes 11 Senate and 13 House votes from the first session of the 111th Congress related to clean energy and climate, as well as other environmental issues such as public lands, water and wildlife conservation.
Watt was given a score of 100 percent, indicating a "pro-environment" stance on every vote scored by the league, while Coble received a score of 0 percent.
Watt, a Democrat representing the 12th District, said he typically doesn't pay attention to ratings from interest groups.
"I'm honored that they would have given me a 100 percent rating, but I don't generally worry about what kind of rating I'm going to get from somebody," Watt said. "I try to do what I think is in the interest of my constituents, in the public's interest and in nation's interest."Watt said he is concerned about environmental issues like global warming, which he says is a serious problem that needs to be addressed.
"I think we need to be recycling and conserving and doing whatever we can do to protect the environment," Watt said. "It can't always be the No. 1 compelling factor in how you vote on an issue, but it certainly should always be in back of your mind."
One of the votes scored by the conservation group was the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, which Watt supported. It proposes measures to promote energy independence, as well as a cap and trade system to limit the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by companies.
Ed McDonald, spokesman for Coble, said the Republican representative has voted against legislation like the American Clean Energy and Security Act out of concern for the economy.
"Clearly, that bill is going to be devastating to our economy in a time when we're facing 10 percent unemployment nationally," McDonald said. "It's going to put all these crippling additions onto businesses who are trying to create jobs."
Coble instead supports an initiative called the New Manhattan Project for Energy Independence, which proposes the creation of a commission to help make the U.S. 50 percent energy independent in 10 years and 100 percent energy independent in 20 years.
McDonald said Coble has supported several other environmentally friendly bills in the past, but his low score this year wasn't surprising.
"This group has a very hard left environmental agenda, and we just don't agree with it," McDonald said. "Congressman Coble is a strong supporter of protecting the environment, but doing it in a sensible and rational way."
He said that the opinions of voters in the 6th District matter more to Coble than those of an interest group.
U.S. Rep. Larry Kissell, a Democrat who represents the 8th District that includes Cabarrus County, received a score of 79 percent from the league. Republican U.S. Sen. Richard Burr was given a 9 percent score, while U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, a Democrat, received a 100 percent score.The average House score in 2009 for North Carolina was 58 percent and the average Senate score was 55 percent.
For more information and a detailed list of scores, visit www.lcv.org/scorecard.
If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.
Comments
Notice about comments:
Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Full terms and conditions can be read
here
Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more.

Electronics Guide
Auto loan Information
Parenting Information
Financial Information
Legal Information
Home Services Information
Gardening Information
Educational Information
Laptop Information
Gift Information
Health Information
Computer Information
Franchise Information
Singles Guide
ATV Information






