Area
Bookmark and Share text size: A A A

China Grove aldermen give thumbs down to adopting state fire code

Thursday, October 09, 2008 3:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |



By Jessie Burchette

jburchette@salisburypost

CHINA GROVE — Aldermen have voted against adopting the state fire code and authorizing county inspectors to enforce it.

Alderman Allen Welter, who owns several buildings downtown, raised objections last month and got the issue tabled.

Welter continued Tuesday night to question fire-suppression sprinkler requirements, saying Main Street property owners can't afford to install the systems.

Fire Chief Jeff Gledhill and Town Manager Bill Pless said the sprinkler requirement would take effect only when a building is remodeled extensively or expanded.

Pless said county inspectors currently do building inspections in town and enforce state codes. He said repeatedly that adopting the fire code enforcement resolution would have no immediate impact.

Welter named two buildings that would have to have sprinkler systems if aldermen adopted the resolution. They are the building that houses Dixie coffee shop and a building owned by David Morton that is under repair.

Welter further contended the town doesn't have the water volume along Main Street to support sprinkler systems and said he would sue the town if it tried to force him to install sprinkler systems in his buildings.

Aldermen Ron Overcash and Butch Bivens offered a motion to adopt the resolution but then backed away.

Answering a question from Bivens, Gledhill said the county is already doing fire inspections.

"They are enforcing (fire codes) anyway. This is frivolous," Bivens responded.

"The resolution is a moot point," Mayor Pro Tem Blair Lyseski added.

Alderman questioned whether other towns across the county have adopted the resolution.

Gledhill and Pless listed several towns that have, including Landis and Spencer.

Bivens responded that he didn't mind being last.

The board then voted unanimously against the resolution allowing the county to do fire inspections.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more.




Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
What do you think of the legislature putting parts of Rowan County in three different congressional districts and two state Senate districts?
  • I like it; Rowan will have more members of Congress and the state Senate
  • I don't like it; it's hard enough to figure out who my congressman is
  • I don't care about politics, so it makes no difference to me



 
 
  
  
© 2011 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |