|
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:00 AM
E-mail to a friend
By Mark Wineka
mwineka@salisburypost.com
A Cleveland woman filed a lawsuit Tuesday against EnergyUnited, claiming the power company was responsible for her 6-year-old son's electrocution in late March.
According to the civil suit filed in Rowan County, young Nathan Kenemore came into contact with an uninsulated, high-voltage power line as he was climbing the branches of a white pine tree in a neighbor's yard March 27.
The suit says Nathan, a first-grader, was playing with another 6-year-old while their mothers were nearby.
The women were unaware of the high-voltage line running through the tree, according to the civil suit, which alleges that EnergyUnited violated national safety standards resulting in Nathan's death.
"I want to do everything I can to make sure no other child dies needlessly by electrocution," Deborah Kenemore, the boy's mother, said in a statement released by her Raleigh attorneys.
"I want to make sure power companies aren't allowed to let this happen again, ever."
Nathan was Deborah Kenemore's only son. She is bringing the suit on behalf of his estate.
EnergyUnited is an electric membership corporation headquartered in Statesville. A portion of its service area includes western Rowan County.
The Kenemore suit says EnergyUnited employees visited the neighbor's property monthly to read an electric meter near the pine tree. It alleges that the company failed to trim the tree or take other protective measures, such as warning the property owners.
The tree had grown 14 feet higher than the uninsulated line, the suit says, and EnergyUnited had failed to prune the tree for at least six years, deviating from its own schedule for pruning.
Attorneys for Kenemore say the National Electric Safety Code requires electric utilities, which have the right of way for power lines, to clear vegetation around high-voltage lines and to otherwise insure that lines cannot be reached and touched by individuals unaware of the electrical hazard.
The accident occurred about 7 p.m. March 27. Nathan was climbing a tree at 2575 Phifer Road in Cleveland.
The white pine he was climbing had low hanging branches and had grown to about 41 feet tall.
The power line carried 7,200 volts of electricity and was approximately 25 feet off the ground, the suit says.
The electric meter for the property was located outside a garage, "and from the meter there was a clear view of the high-voltage line as well as the white pine tree that Nathan climbed when he was electrocuted," the suit says.
Deborah Kenemore took Nathan to the neighbor's house so he could play with a 6-year-old girl. She remained on the property at all times and was in close proximity to the tree, the suit says.
Here's a few more details of that evening, as outlined in the suit.
Deborah Kenemore and the girl's mother were exercising in the garage about 100 feet from the pine tree, which Nathan eventually climbed.
The 6-year-old girl told her mother and Deborah Kenemore that she and Nathan were going to pick flowers. The mothers approved as long as the children promised to stay in the yard.
A few minutes later, the little girl entered the exercise area and told the mothers that Nathan would not speak to her, and she thought he was pretending to be asleep in the tree.
Deborah Kenemore went into the yard and saw Nathan in the tree as she called his name several times. The suit says she became distraught when he failed to respond, then ran to the tree screaming his name.Another member of the neighbor's family ran to help Deborah Kenemore climb the tree.
In reaching her son, Kenemore first thought her son had fallen from some higher branches and had sustained a neck injury. As she cradled his head, the mother found Nathan unresponsive and attempted to revive him with mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.
The suit says she was unaware that he had come in contact with the power line. She remained with him in the tree for approximately 10 minutes until emergency personnel arrived and helped to take Nathan to the ground.
Deborah Kenemore was not allowed to accompany her son in the ambulance and followed in the neighbor's private car.
Meanwhile, emergency personnel tried unsuccessfully to revive Nathan en route to Davis Regional Medical Center in Statesville. It was at the hospital that Deborah Kenemore first learned that Nathan had been electrocuted, the suit says.
He was pronounced dead at 8:03 p.m. His death certificate lists the cause as electrocution.
Deborah Kenemore seeks claims of relief for wrongful death, punitive damages and "negligent infliction of emotional distress."
In the wrongful death claim, the mother says EnergyUnited "should have known that overhead, uninsulated electric lines in residential areas containing climbable structures such as trees are life threatening to people, including children, who may climb without seeing a power line above or without realizing that a line is energized and uninsulated."
The suit says Nathan's death was unnecessary and avoidable if EnergyUnited had complied with industry safety standards and its own safety policies.
What do you think? Post your comment below.
Comments
SalisburyPost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse.
SalisburyPost.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not SalisburyPost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please send us an email to webmaster@salisburypost.com with the article title and offensive post's contents and we will review it for possible removal.
Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Mike
Look at the whole picture people! : Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:23 PM
Becky, making the power company pay is fine. If they violated national code or their own policies then I'm sure the company will be dishing out internal punishment and probably be paying out fines and possibly a lawsuit settlement. However as bad as I feel for the mother in this situation, I still feel parents need to watch their children better. I stand on my previous statement that no child should have been 25 feet up in a tree. Come on people, do any of you realize how high 25 feet is? That is higher than a 2 story house. Would you actually let you child play on the top of your house? I bet not because if someone saw that, DSS would be knocking on the front door. It seems that everyone is letting their feelings stand in the way of the simple truth that if the child wasn't 25 feet in the tree this tragedy would have never occurred. May every parent use this as a wake up call and may each of you become more diligent in keeping your children safe.
Report Abuse
Becky
Couldn't Disagree More : Thursday, September 18, 2008 7:56 AM
In a previous comment Mike wrote: "It seems to me if the mother was *really* worried about the safety of other children she would not be pushing just for a $$$$ settlement from the company but rather for increased training or increased vigilance by the company to help prevent this from happening again." Read the last paragraph of the article again, Mike. EnergyUnited was in violation of their OWN safety standards. Do you think anything less than $$$ is going to convince them to pay attention? I think not. And please don't presume to know what the mother feels. I don't think any of us could know that until we have been in her shoes. May we never have to be. And I believe THAT is what Ms. Kenemore is fighting for.
Report Abuse
Allen
Comply with the NESC! : Thursday, September 18, 2008 6:12 AM
It seems like a legitimate lawsuit to me. Think about the facts: The utility is required to comply with the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) to safeguard the public from hazards arising from the installation, operation, or maintenance of electric power lines. It seems obvious they did not keep up with their vegetation management if the power line went straight through a tree that a kid could contact. Just a sad deal all the way around...
Report Abuse
Carrie
Nathan : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:35 PM
Six years old and doing what boys and girls enjoy, climbing a tree with friends. The mothers of both children were close by with the feeling of safety and enjoying the outdoors. Todays children are not allowed freedom to climb a tree and play outside due to the hazards that are on every corner of our lives today. I am beyond words to express my pain and yes anger that the Mother would have experienced this tragic afternoon. I am also thankful, even in this tremendous loss to the Mother, that she has the strength to carry this to the focus of others in a true mothers' way, to prevent any other family loss of a child due to pure neglience of the power company. My prayers and support are behind this attempt to make the awareness of this tragic loss become a method to mandate actions and penalities for non-compliance of any future neglience of the power company to keep their equipment 'ie' power lines in full sight without any debris and/or tree limbs preventing the obvious hazard. Yes, this would be an obvious hazard to even a 6 year old, if Nathan could have seen the power lines, things could be extremely different in the lives of this family.
Report Abuse
Stephanie
Abby, Seriously??? : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:11 PM
Abby I am wondering if you have children? Regardless of whether or not you do or don't, are you seriously laying blame on the mother? How many kids do you know that climb trees or have climbed trees? The boy was being a boy and because the electric company was negligent the poor boy died. Had the mother been right there beside him or down the street, it still wouldn't have mattered, he didn't see the power line. So get over yourself and stop acting like you "wouldn't have let this happen if it was your child."
Report Abuse
Rebecca
Nathan : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:09 PM
The power company certainly finds enough time in their day to come by our houses and check to see how much they can charge us each month. It would take only a second more to notice that there is danger lurking overhead. I had my trees pruned the other day, and it took all of 1/2 hour to take off nearly half of two trees. Just think -- if the power company had only taken the time to cut back the tree that ended the life of this sweet child! Even beyond the tragedy of this horrible accident is the fact that a mother's care for her child has been questioned. I find it sad that a little boy died doing what little boys have done for as long as there were little boys, and all some people can come up with is to point fingers at the mother. I can only imagine how she feels. One of the hopes of our society is that we can learn from our mistakes and make a better way. Does this tragedy have to happen again? No. I just hope the power company can see that.
Report Abuse
cheryl
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:01 PM
This little boy's mother has suffered enough already. The cost of that evenings events have left a lifetime mark on this family I am sure. Any parent would ask all the what if's....I am sure this mom has done it and probably does it a thousand times over a day....this mother's little boy is gone forever. The law suit is about a greater cause....no other child or person should have to die this way. Let this little boy's life and his awful death, be a reason to ensure it doesn't happen again. I know I will be teaching my children to look before they climb.....let the energy company learn and educate too.....they have a responsibility. For the resoect of a greiving mother and family, let's not use our freedom of speech to to try to judge an already greif stricken mother and family. May God be with them with a peace that passes all understanding. May all of you with children teach them about the danager of high voltage lines.
Report Abuse
Carol
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:23 PM
I think thst this is a terrible tragic accident, you are right about that Abby, but to shift blame to the mother! You must not have any young adventures boys!! All little boys climb trees, POWER LINES SHOULD NOT BE THROUGH TRESS, and the one to BLAME for that is the POWER COOMPANY. I feel bad for the mom who has to read comments like the one from Abby, because I am sure that she played it through her head more than anyone could know. As far as an everyday occurance , one occurance is too many, I will be calling the power company when I get home, I know that I have aline through one of my tree's and I do have young boys. I will also say that they do go outside and play and I do not watch them every second that they play outside!I would like to thank Ms.Kenemore for getting this word out, I may have never thought of tragic thing happing!
Report Abuse
Lea
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:12 PM
This is just so horrible. What a shame this young boy's life was cut so short. EnergyUnited should admit their negligence. It was their responsibility to keep the tree trimmed back from the wire. There should be absolutely no blame placed at the mother's feet. Her child was playing and she was very close by. My prayer's go to this family. I'm glad the mother is standing up to the big power company. EnergyUnited dropped the ball and just want to misplace the blame.
Report Abuse
Mike
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:58 PM
Amen to the previous comment about the child not being watched. While I agree that the power company probably should have trimmed the tree, I also think any decent parent would not allow a child to climb 25 feet up in a tree. I think most of us climbed trees when we were young but I can remember my mother yelling for me not to go any higher on many occasions. How many times have we read about grown adults who are hunting, falling out of trees and being injured or killed? This was an accident waiting to happen with a child even if there was no power line. It seems to me if the mother was *really* worried about the safety of other children she would not be pushing just for a $$$$ settlement from the company but rather for increased training or increased vigilance by the company to help prevent this from happening again. I also bet if the child had simply fell from the tree and been killed, some of the people posting comments supporting a $$$ lawsuit would be trashing the mother and blaming her. My thoughts are with the family of the lost child but I hope this is not a attempt to simply line their pockets.
Report Abuse
Abby
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:56 PM
*Excuse me, it was a tree, not a pole.
Report Abuse
Abby
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:53 PM
I don't see how nobody has wondered why a 6-year-old was allowed to climb up something that high to begin with. How "nearby" were the mothers? I can understand where it is seen as neglect on the power company's part for not "correctly" securing the lines, but how often do those companies expect for small children to be climbing those poles. It's not like it's an everyday occurance. Not trying to be harsh, but accidents DO happen, tragic or not, and you can't just go around freely playing the blame game. The power company aren't the only ones who could have "prevented" the accident--the mother could have been watching her child.
Report Abuse
Mary
Nathan : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:21 PM
What a shame! To think that a little precious child was killed by negligence from EnergyUnited. Most children climb trees. I know I did. It's fun. Nathan and his mother were not at fault. Do you really think a mother would let her son climb a tree that had a power line through it? EnergyUnited need to "wake-up" and pay attention. No one should ever have to deal with such a horrible tragedy. Ms. Kenemore and her family will have to live with this forever. My heart goes out to you.
Report Abuse
Jacquie
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:52 PM
This is what happens when people only perform 50% of their potential on the job. When companies overlook the so called insignificant matters it seems to produce a bigger problem than the problems they considered big in the first place! In this case the results were detrimentally fatal, and a mother’s heart was broken into pieces… all because someone didn’t feel like coming to work, or someone figured no one would pay attention to their carelessness, or SOMEONE else would do it. Well when you come to work it’s not about YOU! Your service on the job is about providing the best customer care by giving 100% of your potential. I pray Nathan’s mother receives the justice she deserves and helps to preserve the lives of other young children.
Report Abuse
Jill
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:42 PM
I, being a mother of young children, can only imagine the pain that this family is feeling! I can only imagine how quickly a tragidy like this can take place. It must be so over whelming to deal with such a loss, and to have to fight with the power company who is clearly at fault!! I pray that this law suit will go quickly for the family of this little boy, and I pray that EnergyUnited admits their faults, and never allows such a tragic thing to take place agian!!
Report Abuse
Donald
: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:42 PM
Just called Duke Power the other day to come out and look at some limbs that was growing onto the power lines and was told that the powerlines was made to hold the weight of the limbs and they would not cut them for us. Told us if we wanted them cut we would have to do it ourself or hire someone to do it. All the power Company is worried about is making money Not if it has a lawsuit.
Report Abuse
Pauline
Nathan : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:13 PM
What a terrible tragedy and waste of a precious child's life!!!! Nothing can ever replace him and all because someone wasn't paying attention and doing their job. My heart breaks for the family of this child and I hope the Power Company wake up and see the error of their ways before anything like this happens again.
Report Abuse
Debbie
Ms. : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:22 AM
To allow a tree in a residential area to grow 14 feet above an uninsulated high voltage power line is not only clearly negligent on the part of the electric company, it shows a clear disinterst in the safety of comsumers. My prayers are with this family who lost a precious child for such a completely avoidable event.
Report Abuse
Jonathan
Nathan : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:57 AM
I think that is ridiculous that the electric company would fail to recognize the danger posed by not pruning a tree with a high-voltage powerline running through it--in a residential area, no less. It is so important to get the word out to everyone you know about the dangers of electrocution so that this kind of tragedy won't happen again! It is a terrible loss for Nathan's family and my thoughts and prayers are with them.
Report Abuse
Mickey
Nathans Kenemore : Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:00 AM
It is so sad that a young childs life was taken from his family due to neglect. It seems clear from the article that this death could have been prevented had the Electric Company maintained their tree trimming . Every person who reads this article needs to be aware of the circimstances around their proprety, and notify ther Electric Comapny immediately if pruning needs to be done. I pray that God's will be done through this lawsuit.
Report Abuse
|