Area
Bookmark and Share text size: A A A

Poverty rate up slightly for Appalachia region

Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:10 PM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |



By P.J. Dickerscheid

Associated Press Writer

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The share of Appalachians living in poverty last year increased by 114,000 to 13.3 million, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures released Tuesday.

But there was good news in the numbers. Median incomes were up in all the 13 states that make up Appalachia except Kentucky, where the median income was $39,678. However, with the exception of Maryland and Virginia, those incomes across Appalachia still were below the national median of $50,233.

And the number of people in the region who did not have health insurance last year fell to 13.6 million from 13.7 million from the year before.

Appalachia includes all of West Virginia and parts of Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.

Virginia was the only state in the Appalachia region to experience an increase in the number of people living in poverty, from 709,000 in 2006 to 743,000 a year later.

In West Virginia, where the number of uninsured increased by about 9,000, an advocate of more government health care programs said the figures weren’t as bad as they could have been.

“I’m delighted the increase isn’t bigger,” said Perry Bryant, executive director of West Virginians for Affordable Health Care.

Bryant’s group, which has pushed for the expansion of the state Children’s Health Insurance Program, said the numbers also show that private employers are struggling to provide coverage to their workers.

“The state needs to make a concerted effort to help stabilize private employee health plans,” he said.

Since President Lyndon B. Johnson declared war on poverty, the poverty rate in Appalachia has been slashed from 31 percent in 1960 to 13.6 percent in 2000.

Officials rely on census figures to help determine funding for economically distressed regions.

————

Associated Press Writer Tom Breen in Charleston contributed to this report.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more.




Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
What do you think of the legislature putting parts of Rowan County in three different congressional districts and two state Senate districts?
  • I like it; Rowan will have more members of Congress and the state Senate
  • I don't like it; it's hard enough to figure out who my congressman is
  • I don't care about politics, so it makes no difference to me



 
 
  
  
© 2011 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |