City: Violations unrelated to firefighters' deaths
E-mail to a friendBy Mark Wineka mwineka@salisburypost.com City Manager David Treme and Fire Chief Bob Parnell said workplace violations cited Wednesday in the aftermath of the March 7 fire at Salisbury Millwork did not contribute to the deaths of firefighters Victor Isler and Justin Monroe. Several of the state violations dealt with policy or paperwork issues, not practices the Fire Department followed that day or how it operates overall, the city officials said. But the Fire Department has set in motion the purchase of 60 to 65 "frontline" portable radios to replace a model that malfunctioned for the hose team that got caught in the woodworking plant. Treme said the portable radios in action March 7 are good — and used by nearly every other department in the county — but the latest Motorola model will be better for "rugged treatment" in fire, smoke and water. "And we were in a pretty rugged environment," Treme said. The current frontline radios will be redistributed elsewhere among city departments. A failure of the radios to transmit was not among the $6,563 worth of violations cited Wednesday by the Occupational Safety and Health Division of the N.C. Department of Labor. Occupational Safety Compliance District Supervisor Paul Sullivan recommended in a cover letter with the citations that the Fire Department "take action on the portable radio issues that hampered communication during the fire." One of the violations noted that a firefighter — Parnell identified him as Monroe — was sent out of the warehouse/shipping area to inform command personnel that his Quint 4/Squad 1 team was OK, "as their radios were not transmitting." The state cited this as a violation because Monroe traveled 75 feet to the exit by himself and did not remain in contact visually or by voice with another firefighter, according to the citation. The state statute says with interior structure fires, the employer must ensure that at least two employees enter what's called the "Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health" atmosphere and remain in visual or voice contact with one another at all times. Parnell and Battalion Chief David Morris contend Monroe was still within sight of his team when he was standing at the exit door and communicating that the hose team was OK. Monroe turned and started back inside the building to rejoin his team when, in an instant, fire broke through three interior firewalls from the office area and put the team that included Capt. Rick Barkley, Isler and Monroe in peril. Monroe became separated from his team members. Parnell and Treme acknowledged an instance when another firefighter on the team erred in leaving the woodworking plant by himself to change out an air pack, putting him out of voice or visual contact with another firefighter. Parnell emphasized his firefighters are well aware of the standard requiring firefighters to work in teams and have followed that practice for years. Before the fire broke loose into what had been a controlled area, the firefighters had reason to believe they were not in an Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health area, the chief noted. The state also cites the Fire Department for not ensuring that "at least two employees were located outside the "Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health atmosphere." It says the initial fire attack into the basement of the office area was made by crews from Quint 2 and Rescue 1 without leaving at least two firefighters outside the structure. Treme and Parnell contradict that finding. Treme said the department actually followed its normal practice of having a safety officer, incident officer and engineer outside of the building at the initial attack. But that standard procedure is not reflected in the policy the Fire Department has on the books. "It doesn't designate that we have those people there," Treme said, but they were. Other violations cited related to self-contained breathing apparatus. One citation says employees using face masks — "face-piece respirators" — were not fit-tested "prior to initial use and at least annually thereafter." Parnell and Treme stressed that Isler and Monroe were wearing masks fit-tested to their particular facial features. They said the violations cited actually involved three other masks — out of more than 100 fit-tested since 2003 — for which the state investigation could not find documentation of their testing. Parnell acknowledged his department was not aware of a modification in the law last year that requires the annual fit-testing of face-piece respirators connected with the air packs. The city has since modified that policy, and Parnell said all firefighters have been fit-tested with their breathing apparatus and will be every year. Another matter related to air packs cited the city for having a respiratory protection program that "did not include procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators." Again, Treme said, the Fire Department's Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Safety Policy did not reflect what it actually has been practicing. The department has a vendor come in twice a year to test SCBA respirator air quality and quantity, Treme said, but the policy failed to state that, "even though we showed them (OSH) we've done it." The policy has been changed to reflect the practice of testing. Treme, who first saw the state findings at midday Wednesday and didn't have time to fully digest the 16-page fax transmission, said the city respects the Occupational Safety and Health Division and its efforts to follow the letter of the law. "Anytime you have a workplace fatality, they look at everything," Treme said. In his cover letter, which is rare to accompany work safety citations, Sullivan said the compliance officers found the Salisbury Fire Department to have "a well-written and effective safety program." Salisbury firefighters are equipped with proper equipment, Sullivan added, and he noted that Salisbury followed the proper incident command system and designation of duties as the magnitude of the fire increased. Sullivan said firefighter safety clearly was the top priority at the March 7 fire, as the department alternated between offensive and defensive tactics based on the conditions. Related
State finds 'serious' violations after fatal fire Locke Fire Department cited for serious, non-serious violationsWhat do you think? Post your comment below. Comments
SalisburyPost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Great resource for understanding this complicated issue : Thursday, August 07, 2008 1:43 PM Thank you for the link to Firefighterhourly.com It helped me to understand, in plain language, the complicated issues surrounding the OSHA violations cited here. It also included balance with Treme's statements.
Report AbuseThis is ridiculous! : Thursday, August 07, 2008 12:52 PM Talking bad about the City of Salisbury and their great fire departments are not going to bring these two fire fighters back. This was a terribly sad day in Rowan County and no one can change that. I would be willing to bet that if OSHA were to walk in at any business in Rowan County at any given time and were to do a safety check, they would find many, many violations. Some probably life threating. Don't continue to bash the City of Salisbury and their dedicated fire departments for things that you don't understand. How many fires and rescue calls have they responded to over the years compared to the number of deaths they have faced? While I agree that one is to many, the lives saved to the lives lost ratio would be tremendous. Thank you Salisbury Fire Department for you selfless dedication. May God Bless you as you continue to recover from this terrible tragedy.
Report AbuseMJT
Lyndsay : Thursday, August 07, 2008 11:06 AMI also am a wife of a firefighter and have been for the past 12 years. I too understand that things can happen and have tried to prepare myself for such a thing. As if you can really prepare. But I have to disagree with you. You know your husband has a passion for this type of service but I also EXPECT for the higher ups to go by procedure. 4 in 4 out! Everytime! This is unjustifiable to me and I think it would be for you if the shoe was on your foot. This could have happened at anytime but if the higher up had not sent Justin out maybe they could have found him faster. Vic did not survive that day and who is to say Justin would have either but his chances could have been better.
Report Abusewell written and effective program? : Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:55 AM That is all well and good on paper. But several times they broke that well written plan. 75 feet away at the exit you going to tell me that through the massive smoke and fire and debris that you could still see Justin? I don't buy it. It looks like a cover up to me. I hope some more digging takes place. And please continue to pray for the families. This isn't by any means closure.
Report AbuseLyndsay Tomlinson
: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:22 AMI just wanted to say that when these men and women sign up to become firefighters, they are putting their lives on the line. My husband is a firefighter, and it is just part of the job. I worry about him everytime the pager goes off, but without them, what would we do? They totally understand the risks or why else would they want to do it. It is truely a passion they are fulfilling. I'm sure the families of both men knew that a tragedy could happen at anytime with their loved ones. It is just part of the job. You just have to understand they are doing the job that they love and pray for their safety everyday. I pray for them each and everyday.
Report AbuseChief Deputy Steve Schenk, RCSO
Professional Firefighters : Thursday, August 07, 2008 9:28 AMIt is always easy to review and find concerns after the fact. When a major incident occurs, like this fire, there are many different situations going on at any single moment. Several departments are present and numerous personnel are doing what they are trained to do. This may seem like mass confusion to the untrained eye, however I know that all of these firefighters are well trained and know what they are doing. I have had the opportunity to work with every fire department along with many of the emergency responders in this county. I have never observed anything other that professionally trained emergency workers in every department. Chief Parnell and the members of the Salisbury Fire Department are some of the best. Many may see this as a way to place the blame for the loss of two great guys. Please don't get caught up in that. Even if we follow procedures to the letter and constantly train our personnel, we still lose dedicated people. It is the nature of the business. But, if these findings get the firefighters better equipment, it may be worth the citations. Government should never allow emergency workers to have outdated equipment. I want my fire department, EMS and law enforcment to have the best equipment to do the job, if I should ever need them. That is what we pay taxes for. Planting trees may be pretty, but that doesn't protect citizens and property. My heart still hurts for the loss of these guys. I have known the Monroe family for many years. My son, like Justin, has been a firefighter since he was a teenager. I can not even imagine what they have gone through with their loss. But I thank God for young men and women like them that dedicate their lives to protecting the rest of us. To all of our city and county emergency workers I say "thank you". Keep up the good work. To Chief Parnell, keep your head up and support your people. You have a great department.
Report Abuse: Thursday, August 07, 2008 9:12 AM Sue, sue, sue. How can they make money, that's everybody's first response these days. It sounds like the state felt the need to point fingers. These violations had did not cause this tragedy.
Report Abuse: Thursday, August 07, 2008 8:35 AM This fit test was put in last year for the whole U.S. We at my fire department just learn of the new standards this year, but like everthing eles it takes money. Being a county fire department we were unable to put this into our budget this year. What is this you need to sue the city of Salisbury whats that goin to do. Nothing its not goin to bring them back. It will be tied up in the courts for who knows how long.
Report AbuseCoverage : Thursday, August 07, 2008 8:16 AM Firefighterhourly.com is covering the results of the OSHA inquiry. They talk to the firefighters and pull no punches.
Report AbuseMonroe family needs to sue the City of Salisbury!!!! : Thursday, August 07, 2008 7:44 AM This is your wake up call...Monroe & Isler family. This is your time to sue the City of Salisbury. Will that bring back Justin or Vic, no, but that will make Salisbury pay for taking the lives of your loved ones. David Morris is in charge of training, but did not know that fit test were to be done??? I would like to see the report where Vic & Justin were fit tested. I bet it will not have their signatures on it. I bet the report was made up after March 7th.
Report Abuse |
Love of history: Teacher's ability to reach students leads to honor
Cornerstone Baptist adds concession stand at its ballfield
Faith briefs: Vacation Bible School starts Monday at Gethsemane Baptist
Gebhard column: Letter to John Calvin
Beloved black bear dies at Dan Nicholas Park
Thunder, Mouth of the South face off in Apple Ugly contest
Kennerly chosen to serve on Board of Social Services
Salisbury woman hopes youth, community will gather for prayer
Symphony, fireworks bring crowd out in Kannapolis
Prospects uncertain for law on annexation; finance panel clears bill before sending it to full House
