customer service | place your ad online | mobile | make us your home page
 
 
News

Tuesday, August 05, 2008 3:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |

RALEIGH — The city of Albemarle will get almost $500,000 for its E.E. Waddell Community Center, state officials announced this morning.

State officials announced that 10 local governments were getting grants worth $3.6 million from from the N.C. Parks and Recreation Trust Fund.

The matching grants, awarded by the Parks and Recreation Authority, will help fund land acquisition, development and renovation of public park and recreation areas.

The grants went to:

- Albemarle, $499,979 for the E.E. Waddell Community Center.

- Kenansville, $267,177 for Kenan Park improvements.

- Franklin, $500,000 for the Pilot Lion Community Park.

- Edenton, $500,000 for Meadow View Dairy Farm Park.

- Rutherfordton, $100,000 for Crestview Park lighting.

- Chatham County, $500,000 for Northeast Community Park.

- Lillington, $500,000 for the Lillington Recreational Facility.

- Selma, $291,000 for Richard Harrison Recreation Center.

- Smithfield, $451,950 for Smithfield Recreation and Aquatic Center.

- Jamestown, $55,863 for Center City Park land acquisition.

"The Parks and Recreation Trust Fund has been successful making more local parks and recreational opportunities available from the mountains to the coast," Bill Ross, secretary of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, said in a press release. "Sound environmental stewardship, education and economic opportunities have helped create these outstanding resources for our citizens."

Since May, the Parks and Recreation Authority has awarded $16.3 million in grants to 44 local governments. During the 2007-08 funding cycle, the authority considered 89 grant applications requesting more than $27 million. A maximum of $500,000 can be awarded to a single project.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up

You can login to your existing account to make changes to your profile by clicking here.


Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
The website wikileaks.org recently published more than 90,000 government documents the site received from an anonymous source. The sites founder, Julian Assange, claims the documents expose "war crimes" committed by the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan. Do you think the documents should have been published?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Undecided



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |