|
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:16 PM
E-mail to a friend
By Mark Wineka
mwineka@salisburypost.com
Four segments of a waterline put in as an emergency connection between Salisbury and Statesville will have to be relocated for the last part of the U.S. 70 widening.
The bad news for Salisbury: the relocations mean it will have to reimburse the N.C. Department of Transportation an estimated $440,162.
If the city didn't agree to pay for the 1,786 linear feet of 16-inch waterline that has to be moved, DOT Division Engineer Pat Ivey said, it could hold up the awarding of a contract in September on the last U.S. 70 project.
That final project (the last of five) extends from the Freightliner truck plant in Cleveland to the Rowan-Iredell line.
Ivey said having no contract in September would force the project into the federal government's next fiscal year. It could mean the shift of highway dollars elsewhere and the project's being postponed indefinitely, he warned.
"It could create a major issue," he said.
Drainage structures, not the road itself, will run afoul of the waterline, according to the latest highway design.
Jim Behmer, interim utilities director for Salisbury, said the 5.5-mile waterline was originally installed to avoid conflicts with the road project, "however, certain unanticipated design changes and additions to the NCDOT project have resulted in a need for these relocations."
Several Salisbury City Council members expressed frustration Tuesday that if the city refused to pay the relocation costs, it would be blamed for the U.S. 70 project's not being completed.
"We almost have no choice," Mayor Susan Kluttz said.
The line in question was actually installed by Statesville even though it's on the Rowan County side. Statesville spent $2.8 million on the emergency interconnection project. Both cities reached an agreement in March 2003, just after Statesville faced serious water supply concerns in the drought of 2002.
Gov. Mike Easley pushed for the interconnection, and the state supplied a $800,000 grant.
The interconnection could supply either city up to 2 million gallons of water a day, if it is ever needed in an emergency situation.
Councilman Mark Lewis asked why Statesville wasn't paying for the line relocation. "This is just ridiculous," he said. "... Ratepayers will pay for this."
Treme said Statesville's cost in the interconnection line was three times what it had originally estimated. Plus, it was turning ownership of the line over to Salisbury-Rowan Utilities. Statesville determined it had no responsibility for the relocation costs.
On the positive sign, Treme said, the city will benefit from a $2.8 million line, new customers who connect to the line and any water it receives from Statesville.
The Salisbury-Rowan Utilities staff also will keep working to reduce the $440,000 price tag, Treme and Behmer said. The relocation costs started at a much higher number than the one presented to council Tuesday, Treme said.
Ivey said Nancy Dunn, who represents the five-county division on the N.C. Board of Transportation, also is trying to work with DOT officials in Raleigh to reduce the costs to Salisbury.
The reluctant City Council voted 4-0 Tuesday to approve a "Supplemental Utility Agreement" with the DOT in which Salisbury-Rowan Utilities will reimburse the state for the water-line relocations.
Treme said the money would have to come from existing capital funds, revenue bonds or through an installment pay plan with the DOT.
Comments (8)
What do you think? Post your comment below.
SalisburyPost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse.
SalisburyPost.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not SalisburyPost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please send us an email to webmaster@salisburypost.com with the article title and offensive post's contents and we will review it for possible removal.
Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Where will the money come from? : Wednesday, July 16, 2008 1:26 PM
What will Salisbury have to annex next, to pay for this fiasco?
Report Abuse
: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 1:16 PM
Gov Easley pushed for interconnections, coughed up nearly a million and then Statesville paid for the rest. What is not to like? The only reason for this expense is DOT changing their plans and forcing the move. As much as you would hate to admit it, DOT is the bigger Evil Empire.
Report Abuse
Chickens come home to roost
Was it Treme's idea? : Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:07 PM
Salisbury should not have any trouble paying the $400,000 plus figure. They have plenty of money for tearing up perfectly good pavement and bricking it over on Fisher street, and don't forget the fiasco on Brenner Ave. How much did that cost them? If the truth were known, the Salisbury to Statesville water line was probably Treme's idea as he wanted to sell Statesville water when future droughts occur. Statesville seems to be far more vulnerable to lack of water during a drought than Salisbury is. Why else would Satesville have paid for pipe in Rowan county? Treme gambled a bit and lost. Pay up for Treme's idea, Salisbury City Council.
Report Abuse
: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:50 AM
The City of Salisbury has no choice but to cough up the $400,000 or the City of Statesville may claim squatters rights and add 1,786 linear feet to Iredell County. :)
Report Abuse
: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:24 AM
If you read the article this is DOT's fault. The pipe was put in with DOT's review and worked with DOT's original plans for 70 as stated. Then DOT changed their plans after the pipe was in - and now they are forcing Salisbury to pay for DOT's mistake. If DOT's original plans had been done correctly and they stuck to them, this would not be an issue.
Report Abuse
: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:10 AM
What a mess indeed. This ranks up there with the $800,000+ block of brick on Fisher St.
Report Abuse
MB
Why would it be Statesvilles place to pay for this? : Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:54 AM
The water line is on Salisbury's side of the line and Statesville did pay for it to begin with. It's not Statesvilles fault it has to be moved. If both could benefit from it, it's only fair that Salisbury pay for it this time. Sometimes paying for necessary things come before paying for unnecessary things (i.e. brick paved road, beautification projects....) Get out the city checkbook and get on with it, this project has taken long enough!
Report Abuse
county resident : Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:09 AM
another reason not to be living in Salisbury! What a mess.
Report Abuse
|