KCR archives | customer service | real estate | autos | jobs | classifieds | place your ad online | Make us your home page
 
 
Area

Despite mayor's protest, Cleveland hikes tax rate 2 cents

Monday, December 22, 2008 3:10 AM  |  Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |


By Kathy Chaffin

kchaffin@salisburypost.comCLEVELAND — Despite passionate protests from Mayor Jim Brown, the town's Board of Commissioners voted 3-1 Wednesday night to adopt a budget raising the tax rate from 19 to 21 cents per $100 of assessed value.

Commissioner John Bradford voted against the increase, and Mayor Pro Tem Danny Gabriel arrived after the vote was taken. Commissioners Pat Phifer, John I. Steele Jr. and Mary Frank "Frankie" Fleming-Adkins voted for the budget that includes the tax hike.

Brown, who is only allowed to vote in case of a tie, said, "You see how I feel and have for the past 12 years about raising taxes. I hate it."

When Steele asked how a 2-cent rate increase would affect tax bills, Town Clerk Cathy Payne said, for example, that the taxes on a house valued at $150,000 would increase by $30.

"Guys, it's not about dollars," Brown responded. "We've got people here struggling to make ends meet right now."

Phifer responded: "It is about dollars." If commissioners don't raise the tax rate this year, he said, depending on whether there are any emergency expenditures, they may end up having to raise it by 5 cents next year.

Brown responded: "I say we address that next year. I'll be right here in the boat with you."

The town has enough money to cover emergencies, he said, with about $2 million in reserve funds. Payne, when asked, said the money — which is invested in bank certificates of deposit — draws about $90,000 a year in interest.

In a year when other municipalities are "biting the bullet" and maintaining tax rates because of the poor economy, Brown said, "I'd hate to see Cleveland be the only municipality that doesn't bite the bullet ..."

Phifer, who made the motion to pass the budget with the proposed tax-rate increase, said towns maintaining their rates are increasing the cost of services to compensate for increases in projected expenditures. At least the Cleveland board is being up front about it, he said.

Expenditures are just going to keep going up, Phifer said.

"You're not a prophet," Brown responded, "anymore than I am."

The budget, which takes effect July 1, calls for $847,710 in projected revenues and expenditures, $304,550 in water funds and $215,750 in sewer funds.

Projected expenditure increases include $4,140 for garbage pickup, $4,800 for water and sewer services and the cost of adding a fifth, full-time police officer.

Expenditures for police services are projected to increase from $271,934 this budget year to $361,893 in the coming budget year.

Brown was out of the country on a church mission trip May 21 when the rest of the board came up with the proposed budget at a special work session. The board postponed a vote at its regular June 9 meeting because Steele and Fleming-Adkins were out due to illness and scheduled Wednesday's called meeting.

Steele questioned Brown discussing with Police Chief David Allen delaying adding the new officer until the third quarter of the upcoming fiscal year. Steele said he wanted to attend similar, future meetings.

Allen said waiting to implement the position would not affect the department's coverage because the numbers of hours would remain the same. The new position would simply reduce the number of hours part-time officers work.


Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up



Most Popular Stories
Poll
Do students have too much homework?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure/Don't know



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |