|
Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:06 PM
 E-mail to a friend
Staff Report
The Cabarrus County Building Industry Association announced Thursday it will sue Cabarrus County, challenging the county's ordinance providing for limits on growth and assessing a fee on each new home.
Jim Scarbrough, a Concord attorney representing the builders association, announced the group's planned lawsuit at Thursday's meeting of the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning Commission.
"This lawsuit will affect Cabarrus County, all of its towns, the local building industry and the many local business that support the building industry," Tad Dunn, regional director of the Real Estate and Building Industry Coalition, said in an e-mail.
The Cabarrus builders group "believes it is critical to have a neutral third-party decision from the courts to determine the legality of the" Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance.
Dunn noted that two lawsuits were filed against a similar ordinance in Union County in 2006.
In a two-page memo explaining the builders association's decision, Scarbrough noted Cabarrus officials have dramatically increased the fee assessed through the ordinance — "from $500 in 1998 to a current rate of $8,617 per lot – a 1,623 percent tax increase on a single industry."
Scarbrough called the fee a "legally questionable tax on new housing."
The attorney said the builders association decided to go to court after Cabarrus officials began considering restricting the number of lots built per year in certain areas of the county.
Scarbrough said the builders association "is not aware of counties in North Carolina that restrict the number of lots that can be built per year."
Annual increases in the per-lot fee, "coupled with a restriction of lots built per year, is not feasible for the building industry," Scarbrough said. The Cabarrus ordinance "is eliminating local jobs and hurting the local businesses that rely on the housing industry."
The builders' attorney called the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance a "complex and confusing document to developers and local officials."
And while Catawba, Chatham and Orange counties "have all received tangible authority from the General Assembly to charge impact fees on new housing to help defray the cost of schools and other capital improvements. Cabarrus County has never received this authority from the General Assembly," Scarbrough said.
Although Cabarrus officials cited the county's "general zoning authority" as a basis for charging the school fee, Scarbrough said appellate courts rejected that very argument in a 2006 Durham County case.
"According to the Court of Appeals, building schools is (a) governmental service to the public, and local government cannot charge a fee for such a basic service unless clear and specific authority has been delegated by the General Assembly," the attorney said in his two-page statement.
Comments (2)
What do you think? Post your comment below.
Comments (2)
Comments
(Requires free registration.)
SalisburyPost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse.
SalisburyPost.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area.
Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not SalisburyPost.com.
If you find a comment that is objectionable, please use the report abuse button at the bottom of each post and we will review it for possible removal.
Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
JC
Want to limit development? : Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:30 AM
Then buy my land from me. Otherwise don't tax me for maximizing my asset. My land, I'll decide what its best use is.
Report Abuse
Jeff
someone needs to limit development!!!! : Friday, May 16, 2008 9:28 AM
Who is going to pay for an increase in the inevitable traffic which will cause more need for expanding roadways and infrastructure. Who with the unknown future of the housing markets will buy these homes. Growth has to be thought out and controlled, new schools, hospital improvements all need to consider when new developments are built. If not for the tax on the builders who still are making a premium of their final products I have been in the industry for over 25 years and i know the profit margins even in areas where fees are even higher than the ones proposed here in our county. It may not seem fair but it is not fair for the tax payer to have to bear the burden of overdevelopment while a national or even local builder walks away with the profits without having to deal with the consequences of impact the new growth creates on our community. Once upon a time community meant something and if people stand up it can still mean something Why does a builder and the housing industry expect us to pay for their normal business expenses in most metropolitan areas of this country. This is not new and the state assembly had best make it a law that these fees are legal in Cabbarus County if they expect to be re-elected. This does affect the housing industry and the jobs of those who depend upon it but it should not be at the expense of the community and the families of Cabbarus County to solve alone there are other solutions.
Report Abuse
|
Fed to buy massive amounts of short-term debt
