customer service | REAL ESTATE | AUTOS | JOBS | CLASSIFIEDS | place your ad online | mobile | make us your home page
 
 
News

Salisbury drops controversial annexation plan

Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:00 AM  |  Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |
By Mark Wineka

Salisbury Post

Salisbury City Council voted Tuesday to call off its annexation attempt of the N.C. 150 area.

The decision came mostly for financial reasons.

"This is not a good business deal for the city of Salisbury," City Manager David Treme said before the council's unanimous vote, which caught opponents by surprise.

Residents from the eight subdivisions along N.C. 150 and elsewhere had purposely flooded City Hall with 659 individual requests for water-sewer service by Monday's 5 p.m. deadline.

It was a strategy discussed weeks ago by opponents, who formed the Good Neighbors of Rowan County group to fight the annexation.

This past weekend, neighborhood leaders went door to door in the annexation area to have people fill out the water-sewer requests forms and collect them for delivery.

The annexation area had some 948 parcels, of which 732 were single-family homes. So the percentage of people filling out the forms was strong.

Running water and sewer to individual properties in the entire annexation area — essentially what all the submitted forms taken collectively were asking — would have cost the city $30 million to $34 million.

But city officials realized they were hamstrung by their own current policies.

Salisbury does not require mandatory hookup to water and sewer services, even if the lines run by a person's property.

The submitted forms were a "survey" and did not obligate property owners requesting the utilities to take them.

Salisbury would have been running service lines throughout the whole annexation area with no guarantee that it would have any customers — definitely not enough to pay for the huge utility expansion.

Treme said it it was "just not economically feasible," especially with the policy in place that does not require mandatory hookup. Also, Salisbury could not change its policy in the middle of the annexation process.

Larry Wright, a vocal opponent to he annexation, said he tore up the remarks he was set to deliver at the council's public comment period Tuesday.

He said he was one of the people who thought the annexation was "a done deal up front" and also one of the people who thought the council wasn't listening as 91 different people spoke to them at last week's public hearing.

"I thank you for listening and the vote you gave today," Wright told the council members.

Read more in Wednesday's edition of the Salisbury Post.


If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up

You can login to your existing account to make changes to your profile by clicking here.


Marketplace Miner
Most Popular Stories
Poll
The City of Salisbury plans to install surveillance cameras in downtown Salisbury parking lots once Fiber to the Home arrives. Do you think this is an appropriate tool for law enforcement?
  • Yes.
  • No.
  • Not sure/undecided.



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |