customer service | place your ad online | mobile | make us your home page
 
 
News

Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |


Staff report

SPENCER — For the second consecutive year, the Civil War Preservation Trust has included a Spencer site as an endangered battlefield.

The site is at the banks of the Yadkin River, near the site of the proposed High Rock Raceway.

The Trust annually releases a list of the nation's 25 most endangered battlefields — History under Siege. With 60,000 members, the Civil War Preservation Trust is the largest battlefield preservation organization in the United States.

The battle at the Yadkin River Bridge took place April 12, 1865, and is considered the South's last victory of the war in North Carolina.

Developers of the planned High Rock Raceway have said they plan for work to begin in earnest this year. Moreover, Duke Energy is considering a new power plant nearby in an area also rich with Revolutionary War history.

Historian Ann Brownlee and the Trading Ford Historic District Preservation Association have worked for nine years to recognize the importance of the history and preservation of the Yadkin River Bridge Civil War battlefield and other historic sites concentrated in the Trading Ford area along the Yadkin River.

Artifacts have been found throughout the racetrack land, Brownlee said.

"Dave Risdon (developer of the proposed track) wants to destroy 200 acres of the heart of this irreplaceable battlefield," Brownlee said. "His denial is, unfortunately, typical of developers who don't care about our heritage. This hallowed ground is a testament to the courage, valor, and sacrifice of those who fought there. It would be a sacrilege to desecrate it in such a callous manner."

The most-endangered list includes two other North Carolina sites: Morrisville, April 14, 1865, and Averasboro, March 16, 1865.

Further information on Trading Ford area preservation efforts can be found online at www.trading-ford.org. The Civil War Preservation Trust's Web site is www.civilwar.org.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more. If you have posted here before you’ll need to sign up again and if you’ve never posted start now by signing up

You can login to your existing account to make changes to your profile by clicking here.


Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
A new state health rule gives restaurants the option of permitting dogs and cats in outdoor dining areas, so long as the pets are on leashes or otherwise restrained. What do you think of allowing pets in outdoor dining areas?
  • Definitely a tail-wagging idea.
  • Makes me want to barf.
  • I'll have to chew on it a while before deciding.



 
 
  
  
© 2009 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |