Area
Bookmark and Share text size: A A A

Smokers no fans of tax hike: $1 per pack added cost proposed by governor

Friday, March 20, 2009 3:00 AM | Printer friendly version Printer friendly version | E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend |

RELATED ARTICLES


By Steve Huffman

shuffman@salisburypost.com

Stan Patterson was enjoying a cigarette outside Hendrix Barbecue in Spencer on Thursday morning and waxing not-so-poetic about the proposed $1 increase in the cost of a pack of smokes.

"It's a damn shame," he said. "We're made the scapegoat for all of society's problems."

Patterson and other smokers like him are up in arms over the $1-per-pack tax hike on cigarettes proposed by Gov. Bev Perdue. If approved, the tax on cigarettes will be raised from 35 cents to $1.35 per pack to help reduce a $3.4 billion budget shortfall.

Patterson and others like him who still partake of an occasional smoke don't like it.

"It's absolutely unfair," he said. "Tax the liquor, tax the beer. We're not the cause of all the problems. It's not our fault that legislators can't manage our money."

Smokers across the state have expressed outrage at Perdue's recommendation, noting that such actions — during the midst of a recession, especially — are unfair. They argue that if the tax is implemented, it will cost the state manufacturing jobs, the opposite of its intended purpose.

In any event, the days when tobacco was North Carolina's cash crop are long gone. Philip Morris USA is phasing out its operations in Concord, moving some to Virginia. RJ Reynolds in Winston-Salem employed 15,500 employees in 1983 and will soon be down to slightly more than 3,000.

"It is incomprehensible that the governor would introduce a tax hike of this magnitude on top of the historic leap in the federal tax on cigarettes effective April 1," said Tommy Payne, a spokesman for ReynoldsAmerican, the parent company of RJ Reynolds.

The proposed tax increase is part of the state's budget, and must be approved by legislators. Payne said he's hoping that approval doesn't happen.

"Maybe Washington, D.C., doesn't care about jobs in North Carolina, but we expect better judgment out of Raleigh," Payne said. "Surely the North Carolina legislature will exhibit that good judgment and not dig our state into a bigger unemployment hole."

He said if all the proposed taxes are eventually implemented, the retail price for a pack of cigarettes in North Carolina will be approaching $5.50.

N.C. Rep. Fred Steen (R-Rowan) said he wasn't sure how the proposed hike in cigarette taxes will be perceived by legislators.

He said the budget will have to go before members of both the House and Senate before heading to conference for tweaking.

Steen said he hasn't decided how he feels about the proposed tax, though he said he questions its timing.

"There's never a good time to raise taxes, but we're facing an economic crisis," he said. "I'll have to take a look at the whole budget."

Steen said he doesn't smoke and won't be affected should the proposed tax increase take effect.

He said one of his concerns about the proposal pertains to how the tax would affect shop owners in counties that border neighboring states. Traditionally, Steen said, consumers will drive to border states if the money they'll save on items like cigarettes and gas justifies their doing so.

"I just hate raising taxes in a recession," Steen said. "Will this cause a trickle-down effect? We'll have to look and see what's going to happen."

North Carolina currently ranks 46th in the nation in taxes on cigarettes. A number of smokers have argued that more taxes on cigarettes won't result in a cutback in sales as much as it'll result in a switch to off brands. But there's debate if that'll be the case since the tax increase will be across-the-board, and not just on name brands.

Ed McDonald, a spokesman for Rep. Howard Coble (R-NC), said the congressman will oppose the hike. "He feels cigarettes are already taxed enough," McDonald said.




If you would like to subscribe to the Salisbury Post, click here.

Comments

Notice about comments:

Salisburypost.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Salisburypost.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Salisburypost.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Full terms and conditions can be read here

Salisbury Post is proud to offer our users enhanced commenting features. You can now build user-to-user connections, follow friend's recent posts, add an avatar that fits your personality, and more.




Most Popular Stories
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Forums
  • Blogs




  
Poll
What do you think of the legislature putting parts of Rowan County in three different congressional districts and two state Senate districts?
  • I like it; Rowan will have more members of Congress and the state Senate
  • I don't like it; it's hard enough to figure out who my congressman is
  • I don't care about politics, so it makes no difference to me



 
 
  
  
© 2011 Post Publishing Company, Inc. |