The Rowan-Salisbury Board of Education made a bad decision in treating a trip to
Knoxville, Tenn., as the mere continuation of another meeting so the board
wouldnıt have to tell the public about it.
Even if the school board met the letter of the
stateıs Open Meetings Law and thatıs doubtful
conducting public business at public expense certainly would be expected to
announce that itıs meeting at an out-of-state location.
One might have greater sympathy for these
hardworking board members if they hadnıt been so secretive. Nary a word was
uttered about the Knoxville excursion until a Post reporter started asking
questions. Not even the most twisted interpretation of the law could allow staff
to deny the trip.
The board has gotten itself into a difficult
situation. It wants to keep the names of superintendent candidates confidential
until the post is filled. If board members let the public know where theyıre
going to interview prospects, someone might be able to figure out who the
candidates are. (Though Knoxville is a pretty big place.)
There are two remedies:One, donıt go. Or, two,
donıt keep the finalistsı names a secret.
Now one has to wonder what other trips the Post
reporter should inquire about. Did the board journey to Alamance County?How
about Kalamazoo? What else donıt we know about the search process?
The boardıs objective is to hire the best
superintendent it can find, and everyone appreciates the long hours and
intense interviewing that have gone into that effort. But the board must not
trample over the Open Meetings Law and the publicıs right to know while it
pursues that very worthy goal.
Sometimes officials seek secrecy when they really
have nothing to hide. The recently revealed fact that they went to Knoxville has
not shed any light on who might or might not be the next
superintendent.
|