At a meeting about the county’s 250th birthday celebration, which is coming up
in 2003, someone quipped that the Post could start a regular feature called
“Birthday Watch.”
The idea may have gotten its
inspiration from “Liddy Watch,” a column we’ve been running ever since
Salisbury native Elizabeth “Liddy”Dole first expressed interest in seeking
the U.S. presidency. As her name has surfaced in stories and on TV programs,
we’ve mentioned them in the Liddy Watch column.
Well, we’ll be watching Dole more
at the Republican convention next week. So I thought this would be a good time
to explain to readers our plans for political coverage for the convention season
and to seek your opinion.
We first started laying plans to
attend the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia early in the
nomination process. Dole was then still in the running for a presidential bid.
If she didn’t succeed, we thought there was a chance she could be a vice
presidential nominee.
As everyone knows, Dole dropped out
of the White House race months ago. And, as time went by and her name was
mentioned less and less, it became apparent that she would not be a VP pick,
either.
So we debated. Do we drop out of
covering the GOPconvention altogether? Or still go, but with a slightly
different agenda —some Dole coverage, but also interviews with local delegates
and a look at the North Carolina presence there?
That, in turn, begged another
question that’s running through a lot of minds right now: What about the
Democrats?If we cover the Republican convention, aren’t we obligated to cover
the Democratic convention also, even if it’s on the other side of the country?
I’ll tell you what we decided;
then you tell me what you think and how we can improve upon it.
We’re making a commitment to give
both parties heavy coverage during their convention weeks. Because of Dole’s
role, we will send a reporter and photographer to part of the Republican
convention in Philadelphia; the rest we’ll get from the Associated Press.
When it comes to the Democratic
convention, our coverage will focus more on local impact and reactions, with the
Associated Press providing convention coverage from Los Angeles.
We don’t plan to count stories
word-by-word, but we aim to offer coverage that is as complete and balanced as
we can muster. News could happen that would make this impossible —say, if some
sort of unexpected incident sparked prolonged or expanded coverage. But right
now these conventions look like routine affairs, a lot of pomp and a dash of
circumstance.
Our coverage starts tomorrow, with
a story about the local people going to the conventions —Republicans Norene
Foster and Mary Messinger, and Democrats Christy Agner and Virginia Graves.
Sunday’s Insight section will
carry stories taking a closer look at the GOP convention and the political
coming-of-age of George Bush. Look for similar treatment for the Democratic
convention and Al Gore next month.
If you’re hunting for bias in all
this, I’ll confess it right up front:I believe people should participate in
their democracy. They should vote. They should follow the issues. They should
resist cynicism about all politicians and go to the trouble to find some to
believe in.
Our job is to help by providing you
with useful information about the parties, the candidates and their stands. Most
of all, we want to serve you, our readers, the citizens who take voting most
seriously.
If you have suggestions about how
we could do that better, I’d like to hear from you.
n
Elizabeth G. Cook is editor of the
Salisbury Post. Her e-mail address is editor@salisburypost.com.
|