A study of the Rowan Salisbury Schools appears to contradict county commissioners
earlier concerns that the system is top heavy with administrators.Consultants KPMG of Virginia released the efficiency study
this week, jointly commissioned by the Rowan County Board of Commissioners and the
Rowan-Salisbury Board of Education.
The $200,000 study is part of a deal that
committed the county to increasing per-pupil funding to the state average. Before they
increased funding, commissioners said, they wanted to be sure it was getting to the
classroom.
I dont see it telling us a whole lot
of something that we didnt already know, said Newton Cohen, chairman of the
county commissioners. Its a thing of priorities.
The study offers many suggestions for making the
system run more efficiently and for improving its basic goal of educating students.
But, says one Rowan-Salisbury Board of Education
member, it offers too few specifics on how to make those changes, aside from adding staff
in the system administration.
They were able to point their fingers at
some specific problems,school board member Vick Bost said of KPMG. They seem
to rely too heavily on adding staff members, and thats been a problem all
along.
The school board will meet at 6 p.m. at the school
systems Ellis Street offices to officially receive the study from the consultants.
Some specific findings and recommendations:
- Rowan-Salisbury personnel staff processed 49
teacher applications per staff member. The average of schools studied is 95 per staff
member.
The system should review this process to increase
productivity.
- Associate Superintendent Howard Hurt has too many
staff members reporting directly to him to effectively manage them.
The system should create a curriculum director or
assistant to help manage the department.
- Rowan-Salisbury places a slightly higher percentage
of students in special education programs than other school systems studied.
The system should find ways to reduce the number
of students placed in special education programs, which would save money.
- Having administration spread out in two offices
creates communication barriers that lead to inefficiency.
The system should consolidate its administrative
operations under one roof.
- With student population growth outstripping
classroom construction, the system doesnt have a plan meet its five-year capital
needs.
The system should devise a plan involving the
community to meet those needs.
I think were always trying to improve
some areas mentioned in the efficiency study, and this gives us some validation of those
needs, Schools Superintendent Dr. Joe McCann said. And it encourages us to
develop strategies to achieve those goals as quickly as possible.
Some of the studys findings, such as the
lack of a strategic plan linking performance measures and funding with overall goals, are
already being addressed, McCann said. And others will soon be attacked, he said.
The study included interviews with administrators
and staff, six site visits, 100 questionnaires completed by central office administrators
and staff and focus group discussions comprised of principals, teachers and business
community members.
The consultants also compared Rowan-Salisbury with
systems in Kings Mountain, Iredell-Statesville, Cleveland and Johnston counties.
Among those, only Cleveland schools equaled
Rowan-Salisbury with the lowest percentage of students scoring at or above grade level on
sate reading, math and writing tests. At 73 percent, Rowan-Salisbury fell two points
behind the state average.
Bost pointed out that the study is limited because
it is only a snapshot in timeof the system. But, he said, it does make some
valuable points.
Theres enough in the study to provoke
a serious discussion,he said. And if it does that, its worth the
money.